2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 3 Causes Replication Stress in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma

Abstract: Given the fundamental roles of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in the regulation of DNA repair, replication, transcription and chromatin structure, it is fitting that therapies targeting HDAC activities are now being explored as anti-cancer agents. In fact, two histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs), SAHA and Depsipeptide, are FDA approved for single-agent treatment of refractory cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL). An important target of these HDIs, histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), regulates processes such as DNA repa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replication stress might be a consequence of impaired NHEJ, as has been reported previously (Saintigny et al , 2001; Lundin et al , 2002). However, we cannot rule out that SIRT7 might have an effect on chromatin structure at the replication fork, which has been suggested for other histone deacetylases (Bhaskara et al , 2013; Wells et al , 2013), and/or by directly targeting the DNA replication machinery. Therefore, the increase genome instability in SIRT7‐depleted cells could be due to a cumulative effect of replication stress and the failure to repair fork‐associated DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Replication stress might be a consequence of impaired NHEJ, as has been reported previously (Saintigny et al , 2001; Lundin et al , 2002). However, we cannot rule out that SIRT7 might have an effect on chromatin structure at the replication fork, which has been suggested for other histone deacetylases (Bhaskara et al , 2013; Wells et al , 2013), and/or by directly targeting the DNA replication machinery. Therefore, the increase genome instability in SIRT7‐depleted cells could be due to a cumulative effect of replication stress and the failure to repair fork‐associated DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) cell lines treated with both broad-spectrum and HDAC3-selective inhibitors, the effects of HDI treatment on replication fork velocity were observed before the accumulation of global increases in histone acetylation (128). These results suggest that HDACs function to regulate replication (or local chromatin structure) on or around the replication fork.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, HDACs 1-3 deacetylate many of the same residues on the histone tails, including H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H3K27, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, and H4K16 (13,131). The lone exception appears to be H3K56ac, which is affected by inactivation of Hdac1 and Hdac2, but not Hdac3 (76,128). The acetylation of specific histone lysines may have unique functions.…”
Section: Fig 2 Recruitment Of Hdac-containing Repressormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In human T-cell lymphoma cells, HDAC3 accumulates around replication forks in a manner that shows a link between acetylation state and newly synthesized DNA; HDAC3 inhibition resulted in repression of replication fork progression and induced apoptosis with increased γ-H2AX and an S-phase defect (Wells et al, 2013). In the case of H3-K56 of yeast, acetylation is required to complete replication in the presence of lesions caused by methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) (Wurtele et al, 2012), and yeast cells defective in both CLR4 and SET2 (methyltransferases for H3-K9 and H3-K36, respectively) showed decreased RAD3 (fission yeast homolog of ATR)-dependent phosphorylation of CDC2 and MIK1 following hydroxyurea treatment, suggesting that hydroxyureainduced replication stress checkpoints require H3 methylation by CLR4 and SET2 (Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%