2009
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00494-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Envelope-Mediated CD4+-T-Cell Depletion by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Attachment Inhibitors

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope (Env) binding induces proapoptotic signals in CD4؉ T cells without a requirement of infection. Defective virus particles, which represent the majority of HIV-1, usually contain a functional Env and therefore represent a potentially significant cause of such CD4؉ -T-cell loss. We reasoned that an HIV-1 inhibitor that prohibits Env-host cell interactions could block the destructive effects of defective particles. HIV-1 attachment inhibitors (AIs), which potent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as well as direct inhibition of virus attachment to CD4, the attachment inhibitor mechanism of action may have additional benefits not necessarily observed with agents that target other steps in HIV infection. In vitro studies have suggested that attachment inhibitors may inhibit apoptosis of CD4 ϩ T cells (1,25). This may be of benefit through inhibition of the bystander effect (2,24), similar to that suggested for HIV-1 entry inhibitors which act by alternative mechanisms (5,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as well as direct inhibition of virus attachment to CD4, the attachment inhibitor mechanism of action may have additional benefits not necessarily observed with agents that target other steps in HIV infection. In vitro studies have suggested that attachment inhibitors may inhibit apoptosis of CD4 ϩ T cells (1,25). This may be of benefit through inhibition of the bystander effect (2,24), similar to that suggested for HIV-1 entry inhibitors which act by alternative mechanisms (5,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they failed to include a relevant control, that is, the activity of sCD4 alone. sCD4 binds to gp120-expressing cells, independently blocking gp120 binding to cell surface CD4 but also all subsequent downstream effects of Env leading to virus entry (1,25,29). Therefore, the alleged increased potency of ADS-J1 in the presence of sCD4, interpreted as an increased exposure of the drug-binding site in gp41, may be the consequence of the additive effect of two active compounds: ADS-J1 and sCD4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BMS-378806 failed to achieve targeted plasma exposures in humans. Therefore, a related compound, BMS-488043, with improved in vitro antiviral activity and pharmacokinetic properties was advanced into clinical development (1,23,30,33). Taken with a high-fat meal, BMS-488043 achieved a 10-fold higher concentration in the plasma of human subjects than was observed for BMS-378806.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment inhibitors (AIs) target the initial entry step, gp120 binding to the CD4 receptor (1,11,14,16,22). Since they act upstream of coreceptor binding, AIs are active against CCR5-and/or CXCR4-utilizing virus, as well as strains resistant to nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase inhibitors (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%