2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13018-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of DNA damage response at telomeres improves the detrimental phenotypes of Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome

Abstract: Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a genetic disorder characterized by premature aging features. Cells from HGPS patients express progerin, a truncated form of Lamin A, which perturbs cellular homeostasis leading to nuclear shape alterations, genome instability, heterochromatin loss, telomere dysfunction and premature entry into cellular senescence. Recently, we reported that telomere dysfunction induces the transcription of telomeric non-coding RNAs (tncRNAs) which control the DNA damage response … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(58 reference statements)
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, chromatin remodeling and the associated transcriptional changes of disease-relevant genes, is also the prevalent model proposed for the HGPS, the most severe LMNAdependent disease (Goldman et al, 2004;Gordon et al, 2014;Aguado et al, 2019). Interestingly, a very recent study by Ikegami et al (2020) further contributed to the field describing a new regulatory mechanism by Lamin A/C.…”
Section: Molecular Hypotheses Behind the "Clinical Scenario"mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Consistently, chromatin remodeling and the associated transcriptional changes of disease-relevant genes, is also the prevalent model proposed for the HGPS, the most severe LMNAdependent disease (Goldman et al, 2004;Gordon et al, 2014;Aguado et al, 2019). Interestingly, a very recent study by Ikegami et al (2020) further contributed to the field describing a new regulatory mechanism by Lamin A/C.…”
Section: Molecular Hypotheses Behind the "Clinical Scenario"mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further study on a mouse model of HGPS indicated that the concentration of markers of DDR activation such as 53BP1 and ATM were higher compared to wild-type cells. Additionally, using telomeric sequence-specific ASOs, which block both-tDDRNAs and tdilncRNAs, inhibited DDR in telomeres providing further evidence for the regulation of 53BP1 foci formation via DDRNAs [84].…”
Section: Telomeric Dna Damage Response Small Rnas (Tddrnas)mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, the production of DDRNs and their longer precursors have also been shown at telomeres. These sncRNAs are transcribed from both strands of deprotected telomeres, hence are called telomeric DDRNAs (tDDRNAs) and telomeric dilncRNAs (tdilncRNAs) [78,84,85]. Similarly, as in DDRNAs biogenesis, silencing of Dicer and Drosha fully abolished tDDRNA production while Drosha-knockdown lead to the accumulation of tdilncRNA [78], suggesting that both the proteins are crucial for tDDRNAs biosynthesis.…”
Section: Telomeric Dna Damage Response Small Rnas (Tddrnas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon reinitiating the cell cycle and entering S-phase (by plating the G0-arrested cells sparse), progerin-expressing cells accumulate DNA damage exclusively during the late stages of DNA replications, prior to chromosome condensation and mitosis, and preferentially in cells with low levels of heterochromatin [ 48 , 61–63 ]. Expression of hTERT, or modulation of the DDR specifically at telomeres, prevents (or rescues) progerin-induced DNA damage and senescence [ 23 , 48 , 58 , 79 , 85 ]. In somatic (hTERT-negative) cells, damaged telomeres cannot be repaired by conventional DNA repair processes and, thus, result in a permanent activation of DNA damage checkpoints and premature cellular senescence [ 23 , 40 , 48 , 58 , 86 ].…”
Section: Cellular Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%