2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with Bacteriophage Proteins

Abstract: SUMMARY Bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems utilize sequence-specific RNA-guided nucleases to defend against bacteriophage infection. As a counter-measure, numerous phages are known that produce proteins to block the function of Class 1 CRISPR-Cas systems. However, currently no proteins are known to inhibit the widely used Class 2 CRISPR-Cas9 system. To find these inhibitors, we searched cas9-containing bacterial genomes for the co-existence of a CRISPR spacer and its target, a potential indicator for CRISPR inhibiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
505
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(553 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
15
505
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce unspecific genomic changes by the nickase, CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitory proteins could be expressed to inhibit the activity of Cas9 after genomic editing (35,36). The prophage-encoded inhibitor proteins AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4, which allow phages to evade the bacterial host's CRISPR/Cas immune system, were found to inhibit Cas9-based targeting in their native host Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Cas9 of Streptococcus pyogenes in bacteria and human cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce unspecific genomic changes by the nickase, CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitory proteins could be expressed to inhibit the activity of Cas9 after genomic editing (35,36). The prophage-encoded inhibitor proteins AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4, which allow phages to evade the bacterial host's CRISPR/Cas immune system, were found to inhibit Cas9-based targeting in their native host Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Cas9 of Streptococcus pyogenes in bacteria and human cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). Rauch et al [41] searched for genome-sequenced, Cas9-containing strains with unusually high frequencies of apparent self-targeting, hypothesizing that these genomes could harbor prophages expressing candidate anti-CRISPRs. This scenario was confirmed to exist in certain strains of Listeria monocytogenes that encode Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems [41].…”
Section: Type II Anti-crisprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rauch et al [41] searched for genome-sequenced, Cas9-containing strains with unusually high frequencies of apparent self-targeting, hypothesizing that these genomes could harbor prophages expressing candidate anti-CRISPRs. This scenario was confirmed to exist in certain strains of Listeria monocytogenes that encode Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems [41]. Subsequent bioinformatics searches and genetic tests identified four prophage-encoded anti-CRISPR genes ( acrIIA1-4 ), each of which sufficed for inhibition of CRISPR interference by L. monocytogenes Cas9 (LmoCas9).…”
Section: Type II Anti-crisprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is the missing component(s) that accounts for the inactivity of these archaeal Cas9 proteins? In this regard, recent studies have reported several inhibitors for Class 1 Type I-F (Csy Cascade) [10,11], and Class 2 Type II (Cas9) [12,13] and Type V-B (Cas13b) systems, as well as an activator for Type V-B system (Cas13b) [14], suggesting that there might also be certain regulator(s) or cofactor(s) required for cleavage in archaeal CRISPR-Cas systems. Alternatively, auto-inhibitory processes may control the cleavage activity of these archaeal Cas9 proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%