1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800062063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract with Salmonella typhimurium gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria

Abstract: Oral administration of strains of food poisoning salmonellas to day-old chickens produced a profound inhibition in the subsequent colonization of the caeca by a strain of Salmonella typhimurium given one day later. Closely related genera were unable to produce a similar inhibition. The inhibition was not the result of bacteriophages produced by the first strain. Neither was it the result of an immunological response by the host induced by the first strain. In additional experiments in day-old chickens, inhibit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
75
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this finding are not known. One explanation may be a more prolonged or a higher degree of colonization of the caeca of chickens by S. heidelberg and subsequent prevention of colonization by other salmonella serovars that are antigenically closely related [38]. Other possible explanations are a higher degree of egg shell penetration by S. heidelberg resulting in a higher percentage of day-old chicks and subsequently a higher percentage of hens that are infected with this serovar, or perhaps a higher degree of extraintestinal infection or transovarian transmission by S. heidelberg in chickens [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this finding are not known. One explanation may be a more prolonged or a higher degree of colonization of the caeca of chickens by S. heidelberg and subsequent prevention of colonization by other salmonella serovars that are antigenically closely related [38]. Other possible explanations are a higher degree of egg shell penetration by S. heidelberg resulting in a higher percentage of day-old chicks and subsequently a higher percentage of hens that are infected with this serovar, or perhaps a higher degree of extraintestinal infection or transovarian transmission by S. heidelberg in chickens [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For intestinal colonization studies, mutants were used which were resistant to nalidixic acid. The Nal R resistance determinant has previously been shown not to adversely affect growth, virulence or colonization (Barrow et al, 1987c;Zhang-Barber et al, 1997). Lodge et al (1992) Growth media and conditions used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous nalidixic acid-resistant (Nalr) mutants of S. typhimurium phage type 14 1978;Impey, Mead & George, 1983;Barrow & Tucker, 1986;Barrow, Tucker & Simpson, 1987) and of S. pullorum strain 3, S.…”
Section: Salmonella Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%