2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05894-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of a cortico-thalamic circuit attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in “relapse prone” male rats

Abstract: Rationale Relapse often occurs when individuals are exposed to stimuli or cues previously associated with the drug-taking experience. The ability of drug cues to trigger relapse is believed to be a consequence of incentive salience attribution, a process by which the incentive value of reward is transferred to the reward-paired cue. Sign-tracker (ST) rats that attribute enhanced incentive value to reward cues are more prone to relapse compared to goal-tracker (GT) rats that primarily attribute predictive value… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…STs and goal-trackers (GTs) of either sex did not differ in their self-administration of remifentanil under a low/no shock FR1 schedule (reported in males by Chang et al, 2022). Furthermore, we did not find that STs were any more prone to cue-induced reinstatement than GTs, which (at least in males) is in contrast to the increased reinstatement in GTs seen with cocaine (Kuhn et al, 2022; Saunders & Robinson, 2011; Saunders et al, 2013b). However, our finding that tendency to attribute incentive value to reward cues is not associated with cue-induced reinstatement of opioid seeking is not without precedent, as other groups have published corroborating reports (Chang et al, 2022; Martin et al, 2022a).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…STs and goal-trackers (GTs) of either sex did not differ in their self-administration of remifentanil under a low/no shock FR1 schedule (reported in males by Chang et al, 2022). Furthermore, we did not find that STs were any more prone to cue-induced reinstatement than GTs, which (at least in males) is in contrast to the increased reinstatement in GTs seen with cocaine (Kuhn et al, 2022; Saunders & Robinson, 2011; Saunders et al, 2013b). However, our finding that tendency to attribute incentive value to reward cues is not associated with cue-induced reinstatement of opioid seeking is not without precedent, as other groups have published corroborating reports (Chang et al, 2022; Martin et al, 2022a).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Sign-trackers (STs) and goal-trackers (GTs) of either sex did not differ in their self-administration of remifentanil under a low/no shock FR1 schedule (reported in males by (Chang et al, 2022)). Furthermore, we did not find that STs were any more prone to cue-induced reinstatement than GTs, which (at least in males) is in contrast to the increased reinstatement in GTs seen with cocaine (Kuhn et al, 2022; Saunders & Robinson, 2011; Saunders et al, 2013b). However, our finding that tendency to attribute incentive value to reward cues is not associated with cue-induced reinstatement of opioid seeking is not without precedent, as other groups have published corroborating reports (Chang et al, 2022; Martin et al, 2022a).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, silencing PL inputs to the pPVT attenuates cue‐induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking (Giannotti et al, 2018). Furthermore, silencing PL inputs to both the aPVT and the middle‐to‐posterior PVT attenuates cue‐induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in sign trackers but not in goal trackers (Kuhn et al, 2021). However, silencing PL inputs to the pPVT has been shown to have no effect on cue‐induced reinstatement of operant sucrose seeking (Giannotti et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rats, specific inhibition of PL inputs to the pPVT attenuates cue‐induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking (Giannotti et al, 2018). Moreover, inhibition of PL inputs to both the aPVT and the middle‐to‐posterior PVT attenuates cue‐induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in sign tracker but not in goal‐tracker rats (Kuhn et al, 2021). Together, these findings support the role of PL projections to the PVT in driving the expression of drug seeking after extinction and suggest that this pathway may be particularly important for promoting drug seeking in rats with a propensity to attribute incentive salience to drug cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%