2016
DOI: 10.7554/elife.19295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition in the auditory brainstem enhances signal representation and regulates gain in complex acoustic environments

Abstract: Inhibition plays a crucial role in neural signal processing, shaping and limiting responses. In the auditory system, inhibition already modulates second order neurons in the cochlear nucleus, e.g. spherical bushy cells (SBCs). While the physiological basis of inhibition and excitation is well described, their functional interaction in signal processing remains elusive. Using a combination of in vivo loose-patch recordings, iontophoretic drug application, and detailed signal analysis in the Mongolian Gerbil, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both cases the timing of EPSPs and spikes and rising slope of the EPSPs were 139 extracted. The timing and slope of the EPSPs were identified using a slope threshold for the rising 140 part of EPSPs as previously described (Keine et al, 2016). We then modeled spike transmission 141 probability patterns for two recordings: (i) during randomized pure tone acoustic stimulation and 142…”
Section: Neural Data 99mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both cases the timing of EPSPs and spikes and rising slope of the EPSPs were 139 extracted. The timing and slope of the EPSPs were identified using a slope threshold for the rising 140 part of EPSPs as previously described (Keine et al, 2016). We then modeled spike transmission 141 probability patterns for two recordings: (i) during randomized pure tone acoustic stimulation and 142…”
Section: Neural Data 99mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of inhibitory and secondary influences on BC that interact with the excitation have been identified (Oertel, ; Wickesberg & Oertel, ; Gómez‐Nieto & Rubio, ; Campagnola & Manis, ). Inhibition, for example, dynamically influences how the dominant excitatory inputs are processed by these neurons (Kopp‐Scheinpflug, Dehmel, Dörrscheidt, & Rübsamen, ; Kuenzel, Borst, & van der Heijden, ; Kuenzel, Nerlich, Wagner, Rübsamen, & Milenkovic, ; Nerlich et al, ; Keine & Rübsamen, ; Keine, Rübsamen, & Englitz, ). Furthermore, the CN is also targeted by descending modulatory inputs using acetylcholine as neurotransmitter (Comis & Davies, ; Sherriff & Henderson, ; Happe & Morley, ; Behrens, Schofield, & Thompson, ; Mellott, Motts, & Schofield, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015; Nerlich et al, 2014;Keine & R€ ubsamen, 2015;Keine, R€ ubsamen, & Englitz, 2016). Furthermore, the CN is also targeted by descending modulatory inputs using acetylcholine as neurotransmitter (Comis & Davies, 1969;Sherriff & Henderson, 1994;Happe & Morley, 1998;Behrens, Schofield, & Thompson, 2002;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, middle panel). We next searched for differences in the expression pattern of Gα i3 between Gnai3 gKOs and Gnai3 cKOs in retrocochlear regions possibly involved in neural gain generation at the level of the auditory nerve or its target neurons in the cochlear nucleus [59,60]. At the level of the spiral ganglion neurons (SGN) Gα i3 immunoreactivity was absent in Gnai3 gKO but not in Gnai3 cKO mice (Fig.…”
Section: Function Of Gα I3 In the Central Auditory Pathway Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%