2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition effects of thermally degraded MEG on hydrate formation for gas systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the analysis of the repeatability of the generated experimental data, we estimate that the maximum experimental error is 1.92%, with a standard deviation (S) of S ϭ 0.54 (AlHarooni et al 2015). Based on the analysis of the repeatability of the generated experimental data, we estimate that the maximum experimental error is 1.92%, with a standard deviation (S) of S ϭ 0.54 (AlHarooni et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the analysis of the repeatability of the generated experimental data, we estimate that the maximum experimental error is 1.92%, with a standard deviation (S) of S ϭ 0.54 (AlHarooni et al 2015). Based on the analysis of the repeatability of the generated experimental data, we estimate that the maximum experimental error is 1.92%, with a standard deviation (S) of S ϭ 0.54 (AlHarooni et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas hydrate formation start point was measured based on visual observations, Fig. All procedures were previously described in detail by AlHarooni et al (2015). 2 (b).…”
Section: Otc-26768-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to perform the optimization study, PIPESIM software was used. This software is capable of determing optimum prodcution scenarios during artifi cail lift activities (Sedarat et al 2014, Silva et al 2015, AlHarooni et al 2015. The required data such as production rate data, average reservoir pressure, bottom hole fl owing pressure, and well profi le data were used as input data.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEG is one of the most favoured thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors used in hydrocarbon transportation pipelines and processing facilities due to its low volatility, low toxicity, low flammability, favourable thermodynamic behaviour, simple and proven technology requirements and high availability (Bikkina et al 2012, Haque 2012). Furthermore, the preference for using MEG over other traditional thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors such as methanol stems from several operational, environmental and safety issues imposed by the use of methanol and MEG's ability to be effectively recovered, regenerated and reused (AlHarooni et al 2015, Haghighi et al 2009). Due to the high cost of MEG and significant volumes required to provide effective hydrate control, following the hydrate inhibition process it is essential to separate MEG from the produced water so that it can be recycled and reused to minimize operating costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating conditions of a MEG recovery column can vary depending upon the operating envelope of the individual distillation unit (AlHarooni et al 2015). Some MEG recovery units operate at temperatures as low as 95°C (Diba, Guglielminetti, and Schiavo 2003), 140°C (Montazaud 2011) and up to temperatures of 160°C (Gonzalez, Alfonso, and Pellegrino 2000), with Psarrou et al (2011) recommending operation between 120°C to 160°C within the reboiler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%