1971
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0500707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition by Reserpine of Histological Changes Induced by Hypertonic Saline in the Hypothalamic Neurosecretory System of the Musk Shrew, Suncus Murinus L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of the HNS of Suncus murinus (Kulshreshtha and Dominic, 1971) conforms in all essential respects to that described for other mammalian species. Even though there are occasional individual variations in the quantity of NSM in the HNS, the perikarya of the neurosecretory cells ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphology of the HNS of Suncus murinus (Kulshreshtha and Dominic, 1971) conforms in all essential respects to that described for other mammalian species. Even though there are occasional individual variations in the quantity of NSM in the HNS, the perikarya of the neurosecretory cells ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The only noticeable difference is that unlike the situation prevailing in all mammalian species so far investigated, in Suncus, it is the PVN and not the SON which is primarily affected by chronic dehydration. This may perhaps indicate that in Suncus the PVN may be the more important site of ADH production (Kulshreshtha and Dominic, 1971). Administration of CPZ (Groups 3, 4 and 5) completely inhibited the appearance of the histological changes that normally follow administration of hypertonic saline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the effects of reserpine have been rather variable. Bridges & Thorn (1970) and Kulshreshtha & Dominic (1971) have shown that reserpine inhibited the release of vasopressin and neurosecretory material respectively while an in¬ crease in hormone secretion after administration of the drug was shown by Chaudhury et al (1962), Guzek & Lesnik (1968) and Rechardt & Hervonen (1975). Meanwhile, Dyball (1968) and Guzek et al (1976) have reported that reserpine had little or no effect on vasopressin release.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%