2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition and destruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
158
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
158
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these compounds take part in the prevention of biofilm formation, but little information is available regarding compounds that are able to disrupt established wound biofilm. One of the potential agents responsible for biofilm destruction is bee (Apis melifera)-derived antibacterial peptide defensin-1 (Def-1), as it has been shown recently that antimicrobial cationic peptides destroy bacterial biofilm (Dosler & Mataraci, 2013;Dosler & Karaaslan, 2014). Def-1 is one of the main regular but quantitatively variable antibacterial components of honey (Kwakman et al, 2011;Majtan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these compounds take part in the prevention of biofilm formation, but little information is available regarding compounds that are able to disrupt established wound biofilm. One of the potential agents responsible for biofilm destruction is bee (Apis melifera)-derived antibacterial peptide defensin-1 (Def-1), as it has been shown recently that antimicrobial cationic peptides destroy bacterial biofilm (Dosler & Mataraci, 2013;Dosler & Karaaslan, 2014). Def-1 is one of the main regular but quantitatively variable antibacterial components of honey (Kwakman et al, 2011;Majtan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vancomycin concentrations well over 4000 lg/mL are readily obtained in the knee immediately after infusion, and with a daily infusion regimen, this level can be achieved daily for 6 weeks or longer [46]. Moderate concentrations of antibiotics are necessary to prevent biofilm formation [11,12], but once biofilm and persister cells have formed, concentrations of orders of magnitude greater (as high as 4000 lg/ mL) are necessary to eradicate the bacteria within the biofilm [7,8,11,12,17,27,31,45,49,50]. Clearly, some risk of toxicity exists with direct intraarticular infusion of antibiotics, but this method may be the safest way to achieve high antibiotic levels over time [54][55][56] while allowing for the opportunity to decrease the dose, change antibiotics, or stop them altogether in the case of allergic reactions or renal toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High local antibiotic concentration around the site of an infected THA is a matter of major clinical importance, because bacteria protected by biofilm require concentrations that are orders of magnitude greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration for the planktonic forms of the same bacterium to eliminate resistant organisms that are protected by the glycocalyx [8,11,12,16,32]. Intravenous antibiotics generally do not achieve these levels of concentration in synovial fluid, but instead achieve levels around two to three times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many kind of AMPs were found active against bacterial biofilms in that way (Dosler and Mataracı 2013;Dosler and Karaaslan 2014). However, the anti-biofilm activities of AMPs are not completely understood, there are some possible explanations provided by some limited studies.…”
Section: Amps' Mechanisms Of Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%