2004
DOI: 10.1080/02687030444000228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition and auditory comprehension in Wernicke's aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aphasic patients were highly responsive to phonemic cueing in picture naming presumably because the cues boosted activation of the target word relative to semantically related competitors (Jefferies et al, submitted). All these features are consistent with a semantic control deficit: indeed, semantic difficulties were concomitant with executive impairment in the aphasic group (see also Baldo et al, 2005;Wiener, Connor, & Obler, 2004). In contrast, non-verbal reasoning was largely intact in the SD group.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The aphasic patients were highly responsive to phonemic cueing in picture naming presumably because the cues boosted activation of the target word relative to semantically related competitors (Jefferies et al, submitted). All these features are consistent with a semantic control deficit: indeed, semantic difficulties were concomitant with executive impairment in the aphasic group (see also Baldo et al, 2005;Wiener, Connor, & Obler, 2004). In contrast, non-verbal reasoning was largely intact in the SD group.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, the fact that the mismatch position effect was not stronger for the aphasic participant population, compared to their controls, shows that strong lexical resemblance led to ''overactivation'' in fluent and non-fluent aphasic patients, regardless of mismatch position. This result had been anticipated mainly for the Wernicke's aphasic patients, given earlier evidence of their impaired inhibition/deactivation abilities of onceactivated items (Janse, 2006;Wiener, Connor, & Obler, 2004).…”
Section: Jansementioning
confidence: 92%
“…This implies that, even in the presence of negative bottom-up information, these patients are impaired in the deactivation of once-appropriate word candidates. The results from an adapted Stroop color word test by Wiener, Connor, and Obler (2004) also showed a larger Stroop interference effect for Wernicke's aphasic patients than for an age-matched control population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%