1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00278254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance of some marker genes in Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.

Abstract: A study on a series of genetic markers was run on five hybrids of foxtail millet, Setaria italica, and on one interspecific hybrid S. viridisxS. italica (S. viridis is the wild relative of S. italica). Seven enzymatic systems were investigated using starch gel electrophoresis (esterase, alcohol dehydrogenase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, acid phosphatase, malate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, cathodic peroxidase). This genetic analysis of the 6 F2 has allowed us to define 12 polymorph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We designated the gene symbol for this trait of our material as NEKODE1, a dominant allele. Segregation ratio of the red stem to green stem in Cross 1 was 151:41, and it fitted the expected segregation ratio of 3:1 (v 2 = 1.68 \ v 0.05.1 2 = 3.84) and coincided with previous reports (Cherisey et al 1985;Till-Bottraud and Brabant 1990;Sato et al 2013). The segregation ratio of normal to spikelet-tipped bristles (stb) in Cross 1 was 147:44 and fitted the expected value of 3:1 (v 2 = 1.68 \ v 0.05.1 2 = 3.84) as reported by Ayyangar et al (1933) and Sato et al (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We designated the gene symbol for this trait of our material as NEKODE1, a dominant allele. Segregation ratio of the red stem to green stem in Cross 1 was 151:41, and it fitted the expected segregation ratio of 3:1 (v 2 = 1.68 \ v 0.05.1 2 = 3.84) and coincided with previous reports (Cherisey et al 1985;Till-Bottraud and Brabant 1990;Sato et al 2013). The segregation ratio of normal to spikelet-tipped bristles (stb) in Cross 1 was 147:44 and fitted the expected value of 3:1 (v 2 = 1.68 \ v 0.05.1 2 = 3.84) as reported by Ayyangar et al (1933) and Sato et al (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We scored tip-branched panicles as ''NEKODE'' and normal types as ''normal'' after heading. We also investigated segregation of stem color (green or red; Cherisey et al 1985;Till-Bottraud and Brabant 1990) and spikelet-tipped bristles (stb: Sato et al 2013) in the F 2 progeny derived from Cross 1 and anther color (Li et al 1945;Kihara 1943) in the F 2 progeny derived from Cross 2 and investigated linkages between NEKODE and these traits.…”
Section: Segregation Analysis Of Tip-branched Panicle and Other Traitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of enzymes (dimeric or Yes monomeric), the number of loci, the number of alleles, but also the presence or absence of distortions of segregations, are listed . These enzymatic structures were also recorded by other authors (Kahler & Allard, 1981 ;Benito, 1983 ;Price & Kahler, 1983 ;de Cherisey et al ., 1985) in other monocotyledons (Triticum, Hordeum, Avena, Setaria) . The isozymes structure that we emphasized in P maximum corresponded well to those reviewed by .…”
Section: Structure Of Enzymes and Distortions Of Segregationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Isozymes are proteins thus they can directly reflect the alteration in the DNA sequence through changes in amino acid composition which provide an extremely useful method for evaluating genetic differences due to hybridization. Manifestations of changes due to hybridization were reflected by the combination of bands from their parents (de Charisey et al 1985). In this experiment, enzyme specific stains used are malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and acid phosphatase (ACP) which gave 3 and 2-4 bands of isozymes respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of Isozyme Patternsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 and 3). According to de Charisey et al (1985), subcellular localization of ACP is varied in the cell with 2-4 numbers of isozymes. On the other hand, subcellular localization of MDH is at the cytosol, mitochondria, and microbodies with three numbers of isozymes (Tyson et al 1986).…”
Section: Determination Of Isozyme Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%