1919
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1919.tb05554.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance of Sex. In Mercurialis Annua

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1920
1920
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And second, patterns of phenotypic variation in hermaphroditic sex allocation (Pannell, 1997a, b;Pannell et al, 2014) and the results of selection experiments on pollen production Dorken and Pannell, 2009) suggest that male function in hermaphrodites is a quantitative trait for which many loci are probably responsible, rather than a single male-sterility mutation. Indeed, females of dioecious M. annua occasionally produce small numbers of staminate flowers with fully viable pollen (Yampolsky, 1919), suggesting incomplete suppression of a male function in XX individuals, and this tendency also seems to be a quantitative trait (G. Cossard and J.R. Pannell, unpublished data). Such leakiness in the expression of gender is very common in dioecious species, especially those derived from monoecy where male and female functions can be leaky (Lloyd, 1980;Lloyd and Bawa, 1984;Delph, 2003;Ehlers and Bataillon, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And second, patterns of phenotypic variation in hermaphroditic sex allocation (Pannell, 1997a, b;Pannell et al, 2014) and the results of selection experiments on pollen production Dorken and Pannell, 2009) suggest that male function in hermaphrodites is a quantitative trait for which many loci are probably responsible, rather than a single male-sterility mutation. Indeed, females of dioecious M. annua occasionally produce small numbers of staminate flowers with fully viable pollen (Yampolsky, 1919), suggesting incomplete suppression of a male function in XX individuals, and this tendency also seems to be a quantitative trait (G. Cossard and J.R. Pannell, unpublished data). Such leakiness in the expression of gender is very common in dioecious species, especially those derived from monoecy where male and female functions can be leaky (Lloyd, 1980;Lloyd and Bawa, 1984;Delph, 2003;Ehlers and Bataillon, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual species of the genus Mercurialis continue to provide an exceptional model system for study of the evolution and maintenance of combined versus sexual sexes (Camerarius 1694;Yampolsky 1919;Durand andDurand 1985, 1991;Pannell 1997a;Krähenbü hl et al 2002;Pannell et al 2004;Khadka et al 2005). They join ranks with only a handful of species in which both dioecy and functional hermaphroditism occur in a single species complex (e.g., Costich and Meagher 1992;Dorken and Barrett 2003;Case and Barrett 2004), and they present one of the very few examples of androdioecy, a potential intermediate path between sex-allocation extremes (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The writer has not attempted to give a review of the literature on sex inheritance and sex determination .n plants, since this -has recently been done rather comprehensively by Yampolsky (8,9,10).…”
Section: The Sex Determinersmentioning
confidence: 99%