Inheritance of Hessian Fly Resistance Derived from W38 and Durum P. I. 94587<sup>1</sup>

Caldwell, Ralph M.; Cartwright, W. B.; Compton, L. E.

doi:10.2134/agronj1946.00021962003800050003x

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Caldwell et al (1946) observed the presence of low numbers of living larvae on plants carrying resistance from ‘Illinois No. 1'W38 ( H 3) but these plants demonstrated no symptoms of infestation (phenotypically resistant).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These authors also observed the capacity of some plants that contained larvae to recover from slight stunting; this response was seen particularly when tests were conducted in the field or greenhouse at temperatures above 20°C. Caldwell et al (1946) described resistance in this material both as the plants' capability to prevent larval development under conditions favorable for the expression of resistance as well as to grow normally, although infested, under less favorable conditions. In both cases, plants expressed effective levels of resistance to Hessian fly.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Damage from Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say), infestation of soft red winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L, in the eastern USA has been reduced by the deployment of genes for resistance in commercial cultivars. Hessian fly populations in the eastern USA have developed virulence to previously deployed genes for resistance except for H13, deployed in 1998. Durum wheat, Triticum durum Desf., is an important source of resistance to Hessian fly. Four populations of Hessian fly, believed representative of the eastern USA, were selected for seedling tests of 26 durum genotypes which had shown resistance to Hessian fly biotypes B, D, or L in earlier laboratory tests. The putative number of genes conditioning resistance to laboratory biotype L was determined in backcross segregation analysis of 11 PI selections of unknown genotype. The number of genes for resistance to Hessian fly was also recorded of other durum genotypes in the test from observed segregation or published data. Some common wheat genotypes were included in tests with the four populations. Most of the 26 durum genotypes were resistant to the four eastern USA Hessian fly populations. The four Hessian fly populations were similar in avirulence to most durum germplasm lines but with differences in virulence to a few lines. The four populations were virulent to the previously deployed resistances provided by H3, H5, and H6. The northern two Hessian fly populations were virulent and the southern two populations were avirulent to the previously deployed resistance of H7H8. Resistance to laboratory biotypes D or L of the 26 durum genotypes was conditioned by one, two, or three genes, depending upon line.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Louise is resistant to the Hessian fly based on screening done at the University of Idaho (U of I) using a mixed biotype population (Kidwell et al, 2006). The two parents of Louise, 'Wakanz' (PI 506352) and 'Wawawai' (PI 574538) both contain 'W38' (PI 410582) in their pedigrees, which is the wheat germplasm line in which H3 was initially identified (Caldwell et al, 1946). Wakanz also includes 'Arthur 71' (Patterson et al, 1975) in its pedigree, which could provide a source of the H5 resistance gene in addition to H3, although the resistance in Wakanz has never been confirmed.…”

Section: Plant Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hessian Fly (Mayetiola destructor [Say]) Resistance Identified on Chromosome 1AS in the Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivar ‘Louise’

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor [Say]) is a major yield‐limiting pest in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production systems. Resistant varieties provide the most effective control method. The objectives of this study were to identify the chromosomal location of and molecular markers associated with the Hessian fly resistance from the spring wheat cultivar ‘Louise’. One hundred eighty‐eight F5:6 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a Louise (resistant) × ‘Penawawa’ (susceptible) cross were evaluated for resistance to Hessian fly biotype C and a mixed population originating from field collections in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Eight to 15 plants per RIL were scored for resistance at Purdue University and the University of Idaho. Data were converted to percentages of susceptible plants within each RIL. Louise and Penawawa had averaged susceptibility values of 15 and 100%, respectively. The RIL population ranged from 0 to 100% susceptible. A genetic linkage map consisting of 320 simple sequence repeat and 8530 single nucleotide polymorphism DNA markers was used for quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis. One QTL, identified as QHf.wak‐1A, was significantly associated with Hessian fly resistance at an average LOD of 26.2 and accounted for 77% of the phenotypic variation. QHf.wak‐1A was localized to a 4.6‐cM region on chromosome 1AS, flanked by markers Xiwb70039 and Xcfd15. Marker, biotype screening, and allelism results indicate that this QTL is different from H9, H11, H5, and H3, but linked to H3 and H5. These data continue to clarify the relationship between Hessian fly genes on chromosome 1AS and would facilitate breeding efforts.

show abstract

“…Its in controlled studies by Cartwright and Wiebe (1936). Another gene, H^, was found by Caldwell, Cartwright, and Compton (1946) to express partial dominance of resistance, while h^^ was shown by Suneson and Noble (1950) to be a recessive gene for resis tance. Shands and Cartwright (1953) reported the fifth gene as being incompletely dominant in its expression, and Allan et al (1959) reported H^ to be a single, partially dominant gene for resistance.…”

Section: Wheat Stem Sawflymentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetics of resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) to second-brood European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner)

Jennings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inheritance of Hessian Fly Resistance Derived from W38 and Durum P. I. 94587¹

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

Hessian Fly (Mayetiola destructor [Say]) Resistance Identified on Chromosome 1AS in the Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivar ‘Louise’

Genetics of resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) to second-brood European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Inheritance of Hessian Fly Resistance Derived from W38 and Durum P. I. 945871

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

Resistance in Durum Wheat Sources to Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Populations in Eastern USA

Hessian Fly (Mayetiola destructor [Say]) Resistance Identified on Chromosome 1AS in the Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivar ‘Louise’

Genetics of resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) to second-brood European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Inheritance of Hessian Fly Resistance Derived from W38 and Durum P. I. 94587¹