1975
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.100.5.522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance of Fruit Size, Soluble Solids, and Ripening Date in Prunus domestica cv. Agen1

Abstract: Genetic and environmental components of variance were estimated in 2 seedling populations of plum and prune at the University of California, Davis, California; the first population comprised 90 progeny of 14 open-pollinated parents, the second, 430 progeny of 50 controlled crosses among 28 parents. The estimates of phenotypic and genotypic variability associated with these traits in these 2 populations were nearly identical. Heritabilities, estimated by regressing the 500 progeny from the second population on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When data were analyzed for correlation between stage 1 and the average of 2nd and 3rd year of fruiting in the field (stage 3) there was a slight correlation increase for CR (r = 0.62** vs. r = 0.73**), while FDP remained basically the same (r = 0.64**); however, FC decreased (r = 0.39** vs. r = 0.23), and FS, FF, and CL were again nonsignificant. The results indicate that evaluation for the statistically correlated traits can be made with reasonable accuracy in the fruiting nursery, in part because these traits have high heritability (h2) values as compared to breeding populations of other fruit crops (3,(5)(6)(7)10). Although ratings on desirable selections for FS and FF were not correlated between stages 1 and 2 and between 1 and 3, all ratings were consistently high, Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When data were analyzed for correlation between stage 1 and the average of 2nd and 3rd year of fruiting in the field (stage 3) there was a slight correlation increase for CR (r = 0.62** vs. r = 0.73**), while FDP remained basically the same (r = 0.64**); however, FC decreased (r = 0.39** vs. r = 0.23), and FS, FF, and CL were again nonsignificant. The results indicate that evaluation for the statistically correlated traits can be made with reasonable accuracy in the fruiting nursery, in part because these traits have high heritability (h2) values as compared to breeding populations of other fruit crops (3,(5)(6)(7)10). Although ratings on desirable selections for FS and FF were not correlated between stages 1 and 2 and between 1 and 3, all ratings were consistently high, Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This estimate is fairly close to the max imum heritability estimate, indicating that most of the genetic variability (82%) is transmittable through the gametes (i.e., ga metic transmission efficiency is high). High heritabilities for fruit size have been reported in several other fruit species (2,8,10,11,12,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If 5% of the seedlings are selected as superior phenotypes and crossed inter se, the expected genetic advance through selection in one generation would equal 0.62 (h2) x 2.1 (standardized selection differential) x 1.32 (standard de viation of progeny), or 1.72 g per fruit (4). This is a gain of about 36% {1.72/4.75 (x progeny) x 100}, which would be an extremely satisfactory achievement in a trait of commercial im portance (12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation