2000
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inheritance in the Conditional Strategy Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any context-dependent decision or developmental switch can be understood as a threshold response to an environmental cue; thus, threshold responses extend from cell divisions to social behavior. Despite the ubiquity of threshold responses, evolutionary models that seek to explain them are often poorly understood [10,11], narrowly applied [4], controversial [4,12], and poorly tested [13]. Under the environmental threshold model, such ''conditional strategies'' have been hypothesized to be environmentally cued threshold traits.…”
Section: Rhizoglyphus Echinopusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any context-dependent decision or developmental switch can be understood as a threshold response to an environmental cue; thus, threshold responses extend from cell divisions to social behavior. Despite the ubiquity of threshold responses, evolutionary models that seek to explain them are often poorly understood [10,11], narrowly applied [4], controversial [4,12], and poorly tested [13]. Under the environmental threshold model, such ''conditional strategies'' have been hypothesized to be environmentally cued threshold traits.…”
Section: Rhizoglyphus Echinopusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than being overlooked however, these aspects of inheritance of the conditional strategy are outlined by Hazel et al. (1990) and Gross & Repka (1998; see also, Hazel & Smock, 2000), and are key components of the status‐dependent model. In fact what ‘monomorphism’ means in the context outlined in the model, is that individuals have a genetic decision rule that enables them to express either male morph, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazel et al. , 1990; Gross & Repka, 1998; Hazel & Smock, 2000). Hence, we test for the presence of an underlying liability in morph determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation