1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60148-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

51
661
10
24

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,125 publications
(777 citation statements)
references
References 276 publications
51
661
10
24
Order By: Relevance
“…These examples all come from situations in which productivity is low and selection favors storage, and suggest that it is possible for organs largely dedicated to storage and that are thus not metabolically highly demanding, to survive with relatively low leaf areas. These examples also suggest that these highly water‐storing plants likely have stem tissues of relatively low metabolic rate, a prediction consistent with the few data available, which show that woods with greater storage capacity are less metabolically active (e.g., Lambers, Scheurwater, Mata, & Nagel, 1998). These departures all are in the direction of less rather than more leaf area for a given stem size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These examples all come from situations in which productivity is low and selection favors storage, and suggest that it is possible for organs largely dedicated to storage and that are thus not metabolically highly demanding, to survive with relatively low leaf areas. These examples also suggest that these highly water‐storing plants likely have stem tissues of relatively low metabolic rate, a prediction consistent with the few data available, which show that woods with greater storage capacity are less metabolically active (e.g., Lambers, Scheurwater, Mata, & Nagel, 1998). These departures all are in the direction of less rather than more leaf area for a given stem size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The mutual metabolic balance between stems and leaves, with stems having a much wider envelope of possible metabolic rates than leaves do with regard to their lower limits, would thus explain why the “too little” leaf area space is occupiable, albeit sparsely, whereas the “too much” leaf area is apparently not accessible, even, as in the case of the domestic poinsettia, under conditions of selection that would reasonably be expected to favor greater leaf area. The readily testable prediction that emerges from our results is therefore that metabolic rate should vary markedly in stems across species (being especially low in water‐storing pachycauls with reduced leaf area; see, e.g., Poorter, Remkes, & Lambers, 1990; Poorter & Remkes, 1990; Lambers et al., 1998) but much less in leaves across plant functional types, from conventional plants to xerophytes with reduced leaf area and stems given over to storage (cf. Jin, Dai, Sun, & Sun, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, low NARs were also observed for all species in response to shade. However, according to Lambers & Poorter (1992), RGR can vary not only as a function of NAR (its physiological component) but also as a function of LAR (its morphological component). For plants grown in the FS and NS treatments, we found a significant correlation between RGR and NAR, but no correlation between RGR and LAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estes parâmetros são relativamente sensíveis às mudanças ambientais, embora os incrementos na RAF sejam mais conseqüências do incremento da AFE do que da RMF, já que os valores da AFE são mais sensíveis às alterações da irradiância (Lambers & Poorter 1992). Segundo Meziane & Shipley (1999), o grau das diferenças na taxa de crescimento relativo (TCR) dentre as espécies, mesmo cultivadas em idênticas condições ambientais, é o que influencia a dinâmica e a estrutura de uma comunidade vegetal.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Alguns autores consideram que há pouca ou nenhuma relação entre TCR e TAL e sugerem que as variações da TCR ocorram principalmente pelas diferenças na AFE (Lambers & Poorter 1992).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified