2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inherent Interfacial Mechanical Gradients in 3D Hydrogels Influence Tumor Cell Behaviors

Abstract: Cells sense and respond to the rigidity of their microenvironment by altering their morphology and migration behavior. To examine this response, hydrogels with a range of moduli or mechanical gradients have been developed. Here, we show that edge effects inherent in hydrogels supported on rigid substrates also influence cell behavior. A Matrigel hydrogel was supported on a rigid glass substrate, an interface which computational techniques revealed to yield relative stiffening close to the rigid substrate suppo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well documented that cells behave very differently in 3D microenvironments than on 2D surfaces, and even embedded within a 3D matrix, cells behave differently when in proximity to a glass coverslip or other stiff surfaces (Ma et al, 2013; Provenzano et al, 2009; Rao et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2014). To enable the controlled study of the effects of matrix mechanical properties on cell function (Rao et al, 2012), we therefore designed meSPIM to image cells in microenvironments free of hard surfaces near the sample (Figures 1L and 1M).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that cells behave very differently in 3D microenvironments than on 2D surfaces, and even embedded within a 3D matrix, cells behave differently when in proximity to a glass coverslip or other stiff surfaces (Ma et al, 2013; Provenzano et al, 2009; Rao et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2014). To enable the controlled study of the effects of matrix mechanical properties on cell function (Rao et al, 2012), we therefore designed meSPIM to image cells in microenvironments free of hard surfaces near the sample (Figures 1L and 1M).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45][46][47][48][49][50] In addition, they are biocompatible and can be functionalized with cell-adhesive ligands. 51 Hydrogels can be assembled from a single ECM protein, their mixtures such as MatrigelÔ, 48,[52][53][54][55][56][57] or from synthetic materials such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and other polymers.…”
Section: Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the inability of 2D culture to accurately predict therapeutic response and the complexity of animal models has paved the way for the development of 3D in vitro models, which utilize materials such as hydrogels to recapitulate elements of the tumor microenvironment [21][22][23]. To date, 3D in vitro models for GBM primarily incorporate only tumor cells, despite the demonstrated contributions of additional cell types to in vivo GBM behavior [6,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. A few studies have examined the interactions between GBM cells, perivascular niche cells, and macrophages within 3D in vitro platforms, but these models feature spatial segregation between the different cell types that is not reminiscent of the in vivo microenvironment [20,[31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%