The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Protocol) 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhaled anti-cholinergics for prolonged non-specific cough in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies evaluating the clinical effect of muscarinic receptor antagonists in pathologic cough in adults are sparse and nonexistent in children (Chang et al, 2004). In one controlled, double-blind crossover trial evaluating 14 adult nonsmokers with persistent, postviral cough, inhaled ipratropium bromide significantly improved subjectively rated cough compared with placebo (Holmes et al, 1992), whereas oxitropium bromide did not demonstrate antitussive activity, based on subjective assessment, in a randomized, double-blind placebocontrolled study of 56 nonasthmatic volunteers with URTI (Lowry et al, 1994).…”
Section: F Muscarinic Receptor Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies evaluating the clinical effect of muscarinic receptor antagonists in pathologic cough in adults are sparse and nonexistent in children (Chang et al, 2004). In one controlled, double-blind crossover trial evaluating 14 adult nonsmokers with persistent, postviral cough, inhaled ipratropium bromide significantly improved subjectively rated cough compared with placebo (Holmes et al, 1992), whereas oxitropium bromide did not demonstrate antitussive activity, based on subjective assessment, in a randomized, double-blind placebocontrolled study of 56 nonasthmatic volunteers with URTI (Lowry et al, 1994).…”
Section: F Muscarinic Receptor Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the features of a cough and investigations have not been formally evaluated for their predictive value in the diagnosis of a specific condition. In the Cochrane Library database, three recent systematic reviews of treatment of prolonged non-specific cough in children (inhaled anticholinergics, theophyllines and cromones) found no eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, in a further review (treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux), three paediatric studies were found but none could be included in the meta-analysis 1417…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only one study on use of inhaled salbutamol in prolonged cough (median of 8 weeks) which also showed no benefit [72]. In a Cochrane review no evidence was found to support the use of anti-cholinergics for non-specific cough in children [113].…”
Section: Asthma Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-microbials 1-2 weeks Systematic reviews [109], RCTs [107,108] Some benefit, adverse events, cost benefit ratio [106] Asthma type therapy Cromones 2 weeks Systematic review [66] Single open trial only [130] Anti-cholinergics No data Systematic review [113] No trials in children Not relevant Systematic review [112], RCT [72] Non beneficial [72,73], adverse events [73] Theophylline 1-2 weeks Observational studies [116][117][118] No RCTs, adverse events…”
Section: Non Beneficialmentioning
confidence: 99%