2001
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200100001-00045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhalational induction for insertion of laryngeal mask airway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when the vital capacity induction technique with 8% sevoflurane was directly compared with tidal breathing in a prospective, randomized trial, no differences in induction times were found (41). This finding has subsequently been confirmed in a much larger, although non‐randomized, study (42). This may be because the vital capacity technique is relatively complex and can be compromised in a varietyof ways.…”
Section: Sevoflurane As An Induction Agentmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Indeed, when the vital capacity induction technique with 8% sevoflurane was directly compared with tidal breathing in a prospective, randomized trial, no differences in induction times were found (41). This finding has subsequently been confirmed in a much larger, although non‐randomized, study (42). This may be because the vital capacity technique is relatively complex and can be compromised in a varietyof ways.…”
Section: Sevoflurane As An Induction Agentmentioning
confidence: 61%