2002
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200202000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhalation anaesthesia is cost-effective for ambulatory surgery: a clinical comparison with propofol during elective knee arthroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher costs in the TIVA group were not compensated by a quicker orientation, higher Aldrete score or less use of antiemetics, although PONV was significantly lower in the TIVA group. This is in agreement with Dolk et al (16) who showed a significant reduction in drug costs with desflurane compared with TIVA. In the present study, costs using desflurane would have even been lower with a fresh gas flow <1 l/min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher costs in the TIVA group were not compensated by a quicker orientation, higher Aldrete score or less use of antiemetics, although PONV was significantly lower in the TIVA group. This is in agreement with Dolk et al (16) who showed a significant reduction in drug costs with desflurane compared with TIVA. In the present study, costs using desflurane would have even been lower with a fresh gas flow <1 l/min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some studies failed to show any clinical improvements in emergence times (12–14), whereas others reported a faster emergence and return of cognitive function in comparison to desflurane and sevoflurane (15). Our results showing faster times to extubation, wakefulness and individual orientation using desflurane than with a propofol/remifentanil regimen are in agreement with other studies and a meta‐analysis (16–19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, all patients were induced with propofol. Our positive findings including emergence and recovery results, also agree with earlier findings at our institution comparing desflurane, sevoflurane and propofol with a fresh gas flow consisting of oxygen in nitrous oxide (9, 10). The lack of differences during the recovery period (pain, nausea, general discomfort and patient satisfaction) also agrees well with the last meta‐analysis comparing sevoflurane and desflurane (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, subsequent recovery events did not differ between the two agents. Six other comparisons found no significant differences in any of the main recovery parameters between desflurane and sevoflurane, including awakening times (12–17). The proportion of patients judged sufficiently recovered to be able to bypass the recovery room (‘fast‐track’ recovery) also did not differ significantly between desflurane and sevoflurane (13, 14).…”
Section: Sevoflurane For Maintenance Of Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 91%