2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inguinal Hernia After Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: Comparison with the Retropubic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared the incidence of groin hernia repair with that of the background population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared the incidence of groin hernia repair with that of the background population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative IH-free rate was significantly higher after an RPP than after an RRP (p Z 0.0001). 11 Abe et al reported that the incidence of postoperative IHs was 14.0% in LRPs. 12 It was greater with the extraperitoneal approach than with the transperitoneal approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 Although the most largely used approach for open radical prostatectomy is the retropubic, there are no randomized studies to date showing superiority over the perineal approach in terms of cancer control and continence rates. [9][10][11][12] Reported advantages of the perineal approach include shorter operative time and hospital stay, 13 lower cost for patients who do not need bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (BPLND), 14 lower postoperative incidence of anastomotic stricture 15 and inguinal hernia, 16 as well as lower blood loss and transfusion rates. 9,13 In the perineal approach, there is no need for the penile dorsal vein complex sectioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%