2021
DOI: 10.1080/1612197x.2021.1987963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingroup cooperation among Japanese baseball fans using the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the external validity of social identity theory (SIT) and the bounded generalised reciprocity hypothesis (BGR) to generate ingroup cooperation in real groups. Previous research has demonstrated the existence of ingroup cooperation predicted by both theories in the minimal group, whereas neither theory was supported in real groups. However, ingroup cooperation predicted by both theories was revealed among Japanese baseball fans after controlling for confounding factors. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondent's expectation that other respondents would also choose to cooperate can also provide insights into the mechanism driving cooperative behavior. Two mechanisms that have been suggested to cause ingroup cooperation are the social identity theory, and the bounded generalized reciprocity hypothesis [137]. We find that the strength of one's identification with the freelancer community is not predictive of cooperation, while the expected rate of cooperation by others is highly predictive of the choice to cooperate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Respondent's expectation that other respondents would also choose to cooperate can also provide insights into the mechanism driving cooperative behavior. Two mechanisms that have been suggested to cause ingroup cooperation are the social identity theory, and the bounded generalized reciprocity hypothesis [137]. We find that the strength of one's identification with the freelancer community is not predictive of cooperation, while the expected rate of cooperation by others is highly predictive of the choice to cooperate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%