2017
DOI: 10.18033/ijla.3655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

İngi̇li̇zce Öğretmenli̇ği̇ Bağlaminda Okuma Strateji̇leri̇ Üstbi̇li̇şsel Farkindaliği

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is to be anticipated that they will have fewer language learning barriers when compared to respondents who receive most of their learning in their L1 (Arabic). However, this general result of the study about respondents being high users of problem-solving and global strategies is not consistent with the general findings of previous research studies showing EFL respondents' moderate awareness and use of metacognitive reading strategies (e.g., Al-Sohbani, 2014;Boyraz & Altinsoy, 2017;Meniado, 2016). The moderate strategy use can be explained by the students' limited exposure to English on a daily basis which has probably contributed to their lack of awareness of metacognitive reading strategies that can facilitate their reading comprehension.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is to be anticipated that they will have fewer language learning barriers when compared to respondents who receive most of their learning in their L1 (Arabic). However, this general result of the study about respondents being high users of problem-solving and global strategies is not consistent with the general findings of previous research studies showing EFL respondents' moderate awareness and use of metacognitive reading strategies (e.g., Al-Sohbani, 2014;Boyraz & Altinsoy, 2017;Meniado, 2016). The moderate strategy use can be explained by the students' limited exposure to English on a daily basis which has probably contributed to their lack of awareness of metacognitive reading strategies that can facilitate their reading comprehension.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, learners who have reached higher proficiency levels have entered an advanced stage in which they can employ a variety of metacognitive reading strategies at their disposal to support their reading comprehension performance. Reading strategy studies in EFL settings also reported that both good and poor readers have been shown to use similar reading strategies, but they differ in the frequency and variety of strategy use as well as good readers' ability to draw on a variety of strategies in a coherent manner to process reading texts (e.g., Al-Mekhlafi, 2018;Al-Sohbani, 2013;Boyraz & Altinsoy, 2017;Endley, 2016). Therefore, regardless of proficiency level, good readers are generally aware of strategies and use them efficiently, but less successful, or poor, readers are prevented from drawing on strategic knowledge by their limited proficiency in the L2 (Malcolm, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the inventory was revised in 2018, the widespread use of the old version in the Turkish context indicated a gap and the need for a new adaptation study, which was also the motivation for this study. In other words, the adapted version of MARSI by Öztürk in Turkish (2012) has been widely used in the Turkish context (e.g., Boyraz, & Altinsoy, 2017;Sarıçoban & Behjoo, 2017), and although the revised version has been available since 2018, the old version is still implemented in some recent studies (e.g., Bagcı & Unveren, 2020; Erdoğan & Yurdabakan, 2018;Köse & Günesli, 2021;Tamin & Büyükahska, 2020). In conclusion, before giving detailed information about the methodology of the study, a piece of brief information will be given for a better understanding of the revision and enhancement of the old form into a revised 15-item inventory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%