2017
DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure Reporting and State Bond Ratings

Abstract: Municipal governments are given the choice of two methods for reporting infrastructure assets, the depreciation approach and the modified approach. Using a model that simultaneously estimates a state's bond rating and a state's choice of the modified approach to reporting infrastructure, empirical tests suggest that bond rating agencies evaluate the government‐wide accounting information differently for states that adopt the modified approach compared to states that use depreciation accounting. The use of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GASB 34 was also found to have a positive effect on state highway quality (both directly and indirectly through spending), with a stronger effect in states using the modified reporting approach (Kim et al, 2018). The use of the modified approach was also found to reduce bid spreads for municipal bonds (Bloch et al, 2016) and to affect bond ratings (Benson & Marks, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GASB 34 was also found to have a positive effect on state highway quality (both directly and indirectly through spending), with a stronger effect in states using the modified reporting approach (Kim et al, 2018). The use of the modified approach was also found to reduce bid spreads for municipal bonds (Bloch et al, 2016) and to affect bond ratings (Benson & Marks, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%