2014
DOI: 10.1111/amet.12084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure and interpretation: Meters, dams, and state imagination in Scotland and India

Abstract: Infrastructure and interpretation:Meters, dams, and state imagination in Scotland and India A B S T R A C TThe technical infrastructures of modern life-energy, communications, transport-stand at the juncture between material orderings of society and collective meaning. Public utilities are both material and symbolic, and both aspects require maintenance-and anthropological understanding. However, recent anthropological approaches building from science studies have tended to pursue "flat" descriptions that repl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, I agree with Leo Coleman () who has recently pointed out that Actor‐Network Theory's insistence on tracing material connections, although important as a way to avoid reifying abstractions such as “the state” or “the social,” can become limiting if it means not taking into account the work of interpretation and ascription of meanings to material things by human actors (see Navaro‐Yashin : 163–165). Material things, I contend, exert agency not only through participation in Latourian webs of mediators, but also in other ways, including involvement in affective, hermeneutic, and phenomenological interactions through which human subjectivities, identities, and the sense of belonging are formed.…”
Section: Scrappy Place‐makingsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simultaneously, I agree with Leo Coleman () who has recently pointed out that Actor‐Network Theory's insistence on tracing material connections, although important as a way to avoid reifying abstractions such as “the state” or “the social,” can become limiting if it means not taking into account the work of interpretation and ascription of meanings to material things by human actors (see Navaro‐Yashin : 163–165). Material things, I contend, exert agency not only through participation in Latourian webs of mediators, but also in other ways, including involvement in affective, hermeneutic, and phenomenological interactions through which human subjectivities, identities, and the sense of belonging are formed.…”
Section: Scrappy Place‐makingsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…To draw an example from my own work, I show elsewhere that in Astana government‐orchestrated construction‐works on a large scale give substance to the reconstruction of the state as a social, imagined, and material reality—a process I call “state‐building through building work” (Laszczkowski :152). But, drawing on Giorgio Agamben's () work, Coleman () argues that the relation between material connections and meaning is “aporetic”—there is no deterministic correspondence between material structures and collective sentiment or identity. Thus, as I demonstrate below, the relationships between the local “community” that emerged at 5 Oktyabrskaya and the state were ambivalent and at times openly antagonistic.…”
Section: Scrappy Place‐makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet as often as dams have been sites of coercion, I would also argue they have been used to obtain consent (cf. Coleman 2014).…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To imagine language only as a material infrastructure (or to downplay mental categories [Latour ; cf. L. Coleman , 460–61; Kockelman , 417–18]) does not leave much analytic room for the kinds of things that one usually refers to as “language”: meaning, identity, interpretation, or habit. But these aspects of language return to the fore through the ways that speakers create metaphorical or homological resonances between language as a channel and speakers’ capacities for movement and circulation through infrastructures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%