2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.115441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared spectroscopy of electronic bands in bilayer graphene

Abstract: We present infrared spectra ͑0.1-1 eV͒ of electrostatically gated bilayer graphene as a function of doping and compare it with tight-binding calculations. All major spectral features corresponding to the expected interband transitions are identified in the spectra: a strong peak due to transitions between parallel split-off bands and two onset-like features due to transitions between valence and conduction bands. A strong gate voltage dependence of these structures and a significant electron-hole asymmetry are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
196
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
196
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there are five independent parameters in the Hamiltonian (16) of intrinsic bilayer graphene, namely γ 0 , γ 1 , γ 3 , γ 4 and ∆ ′ . The band structure predicted by the tight-binding model has been compared to observations from photoemission [16], Raman [76] and infrared spectroscopy [55,56,[78][79][80][81]. Parameter values determined by fitting to experiments are listed in Table I for bulk graphite [67], for bilayer graphene by Raman [76,77] and infrared [55,56,80] spectroscopy, and for a This parameter was not determined by the given experiment, the value quoted was taken from previous literature.…”
Section: Bilayer Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, there are five independent parameters in the Hamiltonian (16) of intrinsic bilayer graphene, namely γ 0 , γ 1 , γ 3 , γ 4 and ∆ ′ . The band structure predicted by the tight-binding model has been compared to observations from photoemission [16], Raman [76] and infrared spectroscopy [55,56,[78][79][80][81]. Parameter values determined by fitting to experiments are listed in Table I for bulk graphite [67], for bilayer graphene by Raman [76,77] and infrared [55,56,80] spectroscopy, and for a This parameter was not determined by the given experiment, the value quoted was taken from previous literature.…”
Section: Bilayer Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic structure of bilayer graphene was probed by spectroscopic measurements in zero magnetic field [16,55,56,79,80,129,130], and also in high magnetic fields [78]. The optical absorption for perpendicularly incident light is described by the dynamical conductivity in a electric field parallel to the layers, in both symmetric bilayers [164,[226][227][228] and in the presence of an interlayer-asymmetry gap [227] For symmetric bilayer graphene, this is explicitly estimated as [164,[226][227][228] Re σ xx (ω) = g v g s 16…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electrostatic tuning of graphene is readily attainable in gated structures. Through back-gating, we were able to explore the key aspects of tunneling plasmonics on bilayer graphene plasmons by tuning both the Fermi energy as well as interlayer doping asymmetry 16,18,19 . In Figure 2, we show a selected dataset of gate-dependent near-field images of a graphene sample containing both single-layer and bilayer graphene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perpendicular electric field breaks the inversion symmetry between the two graphene layers and results in a field-dependent bandgap 1-3 . Its experimental signatures have been observed by infrared spectroscopy [4][5][6][7] and angle-resolved photoemission 8 , but remain incomplete and perplexing in transport [9][10][11][12] . Near room temperature, Xia et al observes thermally activated conduction and attributes it to Schottky barriers at the electrode-gapped bilayer interface 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%