2008
DOI: 10.1021/jp806738a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared Spectroscopy and Optical Constants of Porous Amorphous Solid Water

Abstract: Reflection-absorption infrared spectra (RAIRS) of amorphous solid water (ASW) films grown at 20 K on a Pt(111) substrate at various angles (theta(Beam) = 0-85 degrees ) using a molecular beam are reported. They display complex features arising from the interplay between refraction, absorption within the sample, and interference effects between the multiple reflections at the film-substrate and film-vacuum interfaces. Using a simple classical optics model based on Fresnel equations, we obtain optical constants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra were averaged 1024 times at a spectral resolution of 4 cm –1 . The sloped baselines of the spectra, caused by the increasing negative reflection–absorption with increasing wavenumber, , were corrected for better visualization.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were averaged 1024 times at a spectral resolution of 4 cm –1 . The sloped baselines of the spectra, caused by the increasing negative reflection–absorption with increasing wavenumber, , were corrected for better visualization.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All RAIR spectra were averaged over 256 times and acquired in 4 cm –1 spectral resolution. For better visualization, all spectra were baseline-corrected by subtracting the spectra of pure Xe films with similar optical thicknesses, mainly compensating the sloping baselines caused by the greater negative absorbance with increasing wavenumbers. , …”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may further support the “amorphous” versus “crystalline” designation of the two films. A more amorphous film typically presents a larger exposed surface area (due to islands, microporous pockets, and undercoordinated surface molecules) than the crystalline film. , A larger surface area would provide more accessible surface propene molecules, and thus, a faster observable rate of initial reaction before oxygen penetration into the bulk becomes necessary for continued reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%