2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared signatures of positive and negative charge carriers in conjugated polymers with low band gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FT-IR spectra shown in Figure 2 for p-doped PEDOT is near identical to that given by Neugebauer [31] and similar to others, [27,32] with only slight variations in the relative intensities of the peaks in the interval from 400 to 1 600 cm…”
Section: Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The FT-IR spectra shown in Figure 2 for p-doped PEDOT is near identical to that given by Neugebauer [31] and similar to others, [27,32] with only slight variations in the relative intensities of the peaks in the interval from 400 to 1 600 cm…”
Section: Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Fig. 2) [23,24]. The conductivity of the mat was measured with a four-point probe setup and gave an average value of 60 ± 10Scm −1 .…”
Section: Pedot Nanofibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PCPDT-BT, the cyclopenta-dithiophene (CPDT) moiety is D and the BT moiety is A. We used infrared spectroscopy to study microscopic changes induced by doping, as this technique is known to be sensitive to the presence of charged species in conjugated polymers through molecular vibrations [27][28][29] . An advantage of looking at vibrations is that their absorption resonances are less affected by inhomogeneous broadening, an effect which is instead markedly impacting the amount of information possibly extracted from electronic transitions in conjugated polymers 30,31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%