The Milky Way Galaxy 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5291-1_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared Scanning of the Galactic Bulge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
9
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Above this limit, the comparison is affected by increased internal errors in both extinction determinations. However, a comparison with the Galactic center map of Catchpole et al (1990) gives a good agreement with differences less than A V = 2 mag. The resulting map has a spatial resolution of 2 arcminutes and is the average total extinction along that line of sight to a distance of 8 kpc from the Sun.…”
Section: Extinction In the Galactic Central Regionsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Above this limit, the comparison is affected by increased internal errors in both extinction determinations. However, a comparison with the Galactic center map of Catchpole et al (1990) gives a good agreement with differences less than A V = 2 mag. The resulting map has a spatial resolution of 2 arcminutes and is the average total extinction along that line of sight to a distance of 8 kpc from the Sun.…”
Section: Extinction In the Galactic Central Regionsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The enclosed mass in the region 5 [ r/pc [ 100 obtained by Lindqvist et al (1992a) also implies a surface density proÐle of P r~0.8. On the other hand, by Ðtting an ellipse with an aspect ratio of 2.2 to the distribution of stars with dereddened, apparent K mag between 5 and 6 (Haller & Rieke 1999 estimate such stars to be a few 108 yr old), Catchpole et al (1990) obtained by Catchpole et al In any case, it appears reasonable to assume that the time-averaged star formation efficiency in the inner bulge has a dependence between R~2 and R~1 in the plane.…”
Section: Density Proðles and Aspect Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While the aspect ratio of the bulge is 1.6È1.7 (Kent, Dame, & Fazio 1991 ;Weiland et al 1994), those of the stellar population and the CMZ are D2.2 (Catchpole, Whitelock, & Glass 1990) and D4 , respectively. The mass of the stellar population within the D100 pc extent of the CMZ, D109 falls near the lower end of the range M _ , predicted for the stellar mass emerging from the CMZ over the GalaxyÏs lifetime, and consider this to be additional support for the association between the stellar population and the CMZ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any bar-like structure will be centrally concentrated, and a relatively small survey concentrating on sources near the centre will have enough statistical weight to show up longitude dependent asymmetries, if they exist. The only moderately sized, multicolour, higher resolution survey, covering about 2 • × 0.5 • around the Galactic centre, is by Catchpole, Whitelock and Glass (1990). It was performed in the J, H and K bands up to a limiting magnitude of K=12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%