2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared photometry and evolution of mass-losing AGB stars

Abstract: Context. The asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase marks the end of the evolution for low-and intermediate-mass stars, which are fundamental contributors to the mass return to the interstellar medium and to the chemical evolution of galaxies. The detailed understanding of mass loss processes is hampered by the poor knowledge of the luminosities and distances of AGB stars. Aims. In a series of papers we are trying to establish criteria permitting a more quantitative determination of luminosities for the various t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown (Knapp 1985) that oxygen-rich stars have a wider range of mass-loss rates than C-rich stars for which theṀ is globally more homogeneous. On average, mass loss rates of C stars are higher than those of MS and S stars (Guandalini 2010). Apart from the fact that the mass-loss rate standard deviation of O-rich stars is indeed found to be somewhat larger than that of C-rich stars, no clear dichotomy emerges between the mass loss rates of O-rich stars and C-rich stars in the present sample.…”
Section: Oxygen-rich Versus Carbon-rich Chemistrycontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…It has been shown (Knapp 1985) that oxygen-rich stars have a wider range of mass-loss rates than C-rich stars for which theṀ is globally more homogeneous. On average, mass loss rates of C stars are higher than those of MS and S stars (Guandalini 2010). Apart from the fact that the mass-loss rate standard deviation of O-rich stars is indeed found to be somewhat larger than that of C-rich stars, no clear dichotomy emerges between the mass loss rates of O-rich stars and C-rich stars in the present sample.…”
Section: Oxygen-rich Versus Carbon-rich Chemistrycontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…2 in that paper), the present model is in agreement with the bolometric magnitude (M bol ) observed for TP−AGB stars (e.g. [12]). PPN is described in Herwig et al (this vol.…”
Section: Post−processing Calculationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…All our models include the mass‐loss rate from Vassiliadis and Wood (1993), which mimics the entire evolution of the mass‐loss rate in AGB stars. This includes an initial long phase where the star remains a semi‐regular variable, with rather short variability periods and moderate mass‐loss rates (of the order of 10 −7 M ⊙ /yr, e.g., Guandalini et al. 2006) and a final “superwind” phase, which sets off when the radial pulsation period exceeds 500 days, with the mass‐loss rate increasing to a few 10 −5 M ⊙ /yr.…”
Section: Super‐agb Stellar Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%