1999
DOI: 10.2307/3761625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrageneric Classification of the Boleticolous Genus Sepedonium: Species Delimitation and Phylogenetic Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). careful examination of conidia under SEM allowed classification of the parasite to the species Sepedonium laevi gatum Sahr & ammer (Sahr et al 1999). The infection of Octaviania asterosperma basidiomata by Sepedonium chrysospermum (Bull.)…”
Section: Basidiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). careful examination of conidia under SEM allowed classification of the parasite to the species Sepedonium laevi gatum Sahr & ammer (Sahr et al 1999). The infection of Octaviania asterosperma basidiomata by Sepedonium chrysospermum (Bull.)…”
Section: Basidiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the similarity in spore morphology was found to be superficial, and the 2 genera were suggested to have affinities to different orders, the Gomphales for Gautiera and Boletales for Chamonixia (Beaton et al 1985;Binder and Bresinsky 2002). The presence of the bolete fungal parasite Sependonium on sporocarps provided further support for placement of Chamonixia in the Boletales (Sahr et al 1999). The sequestrate genus Rhodactina also has longitudinally ridged/winged spores, however it is quite distinct morphologically, lacking the blue staining of the sporocarp and the spores are deep purple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spiny chlamydospores resembling those of Echinochlamydosporium and Mortierella are also produced by some anamorphic Ascomycetes (Damon 1952;Sahr et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%