Informing Food Consumption Choices: Innovations in Measuring and Labelling

Abstract

The need to inform consumers about the health impact of their food choices is ever more pressing in a world where obesity is a growing problem. Concerns over food safety, its origins and its environmental impacts are also growing, as frequently reported in the popular press in many parts of the world. Nutritional and health information on food labels is quite well developed, but the complex nature of the information presented may hinder widespread use of the existing labels. In comparison, there has been little widespread success of carbon labels on food, and their usefulness in reducing carbon emissions from consumption is uncertain. In an attempt to address the need for clearer information on health and environmental impacts of food purchases, we present a novel dual-purpose food labelling system which provides information on both health and environmental impacts of food items. This paper presents results from a pilot study introducing a novel approach to food labelling: a simplified, combined carbon and health label to inform consumers simultaneously about the environmental and health impacts of their choices. Environmental impacts of various food categories were calculated on the basis of their relative energy use along the supply chain by using a newly designed Food Energy Index. Health impacts were based on the NuVal system developed in the USA in 2010. As part of the Norfolk Island Carbon and Health Evaluation study (NICHE), labels were designed, tested and displayed on 25 food categories for a 3-month period in the main supermarket on Norfolk Island (Australia). The in-store labelling trial was followed by a consumer survey on their attitudes to the labels. The results from this pilot trial indicate that consumers were supportive of food labelling including both environmental and health impacts, but the information provided in the dual labels was not sufficient to induce changes in consumption between food categories. We conclude that simple label design is clearly essential, and our findings warrant further investigation, including a broader study using a larger population and a wider range of food How to cite this paper:

The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review

“…Of the 10 studies that tested the effects on actual purchases, nine studies significantly favored the intervention, and one study (GHG emissions information in logo form) showed mixed effects across products (Brunner et al, 2018). The studies that favored the intervention condition included three organic claim interventions (two in logo and one in text form) (Aerni et al, 2011; Daunfeldt & Rudholm, 2014; Zanoli et al, 2015), three GHG emissions information interventions (one in text form, one in logo form, and one in combined logo and text form) (Aoki & Akai, 2013; Elofsson et al, 2016; Pelletier et al, 2016), one intervention assessing an environmentally sustainable claim in logo form (Hallstein & Villas-Boas, 2013), and one intervention assessing a water use claim in logo form (Wuepper et al, 2019).…”

Food values influencing consumers' decisions in a sub-Saharan African country

“…, 2013; Lee et al. , 2018; Pelletier et al. , 2016); individual aspects, such as sociodemographics, motivations and values (Chen, 2007; Wadolowska et al.…”

“…Asp, 1999;Birch, 1999;Capaldi, 1996;Furst et al, 1996;Jaeger et al, 2011;Shepherd, 1989;Vabø and Hansen, 2014;Wansink and Sobal, 2007). The factors influencing final consumers' food decisions include the sensory attributes of foods and the information on the product packaging (Kim et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2018;Pelletier et al, 2016); individual aspects, such as sociodemographics, motivations and values (Chen, 2007;Wadolowska et al, 2008); aspects related to the context and social interaction (Herman et al, 2003;Higgs and Thomas, 2016); and environmental aspects (Furst et al, 1996). Given the complexity and diversity of the aspects influencing consumer food decisions, the work by Shepherd (1989) is of relevance to our research, since it classified the factors affecting food preferences and choice into three main groups: The first group, product-related factors, includes chemical properties of food, sensory qualities (e.g.…”

Soft Economic Incentives and Soft Behavioral Interventions on the Public’s Green Purchasing Behaviour - The Evidence from China

“…The main limitation of this study is the use of an online simulated contextual policy experiment design rather than a field study. 99 , 100 In a real purchase consumption, it is possible that participants would not make the same choices as in our task, especially given the large influence of habits. 101 , 102 At the same time, questionnaires rely on self-reporting by the public, which may introduce biases associated with data collection.…”