Informing fieldwork design: Key elements to quality in fieldwork education for undergraduate occupational therapy students

Abstract

Aim:In this current climate of escalating student fees, students as paying consumers expect a quality fieldwork experience. However, the ability of universities to deliver quality fieldwork programs is compromised by the increasing pressure experienced by fieldwork educators to meet productivity targets in the face of diminishing resources. This paper details how one university, Monash University, sought input from stakeholders to design a fieldwork program. Methods: This qualitative study utilised focus groups to inform the researchers of stakeholders' perceptions of what constitutes quality fieldwork education. A total of five focus groups were held, involving 47 occupational therapists practising in Victoria.Results: The major findings include the need to provide ongoing professional development for fieldwork educators, the need to develop tangible strategies in recognition of their contribution towards fieldwork education, and the imperative for closer collaboration between universities and fieldwork educators. Conclusions: Based on literature and in response to the focus group discussions, Monash University has implemented a number of measures to ensure the successful implementation of quality fieldwork education. These include providing ongoing professional development for fieldwork educators to enhance their role, addressing fieldwork educators' concerns about project placements and supporting students with fieldwork relocation. Most importantly, this study demonstrates the need for educational institutions to take the lead in dialogue with the profession to enhance a collaborative response to constant changes in health-care directions. The importance of ongoing research to inform quality fieldwork education is critical to moving the profession forward.

Preparing the Dietetic Workforce of the Future – Developing Innovative Placements in Social Care Settings

“…This again is in keeping with previous literature (Kirke, Layton and Sim 2007), and in our experience these anxieties were mitigated by sharing the learning outcomes and experiences of the students who had undertaken these placements. It should also be noted that the sample size in this project was small and drawn from dietetic students in Scotland; it does however start a dialogue on the role of social care placements in pre-registration dietetic education.…”

Pre-entry student clinical placement demand: can it be met?

“…2 Commitments to clinical education at a national and state government level, innovation in clinical placement provision and support and recognition for clinical educators are reported as contributing to the capacity of healthcare services to meet the challenge posed by this increasing demand. 3,4 Guidelines for a coherent and collaborative approach to clinical education have been recommended, with the need for the tertiary education and healthcare sectors to work in partnership as a central tenet. 3,5,6 The capacity of health services for student placement provision has been the topic of considerable professional and academic debate, 7,8 commonly stimulated by changes to university programs or health service systems.…”

‘Facing Uncharted Waters’: Challenges experienced by Occupational Therapy Students undertaking Role-emerging Placements

“…Other literature suggests that role-emerging placements may be the most significant learning experience that students have in preparing them for practice (Alsop and Donald 1996, Fieldhouse and Fedden 2009, Clarke et al 2014a. Conversely, authors have highlighted placement limitations such as difficulties establishing professional identity, compromising clinical experiences, disadvantaging weaker students and different expectations of students' on-site and off-site supervisors (Fisher and Savin-Baden 2002, Wood 2005, Hook and Kenney 2007, Cooper and Raine 2009, Thomas and Roger 2011, Kirke, Layton, and Sim 2007, Thew, Hargreaves, and Cronin-Davis 2008. Whilst much of the early literature tends to be opinion based regarding potential benefits (Westmorland and Jung 1997, Bilics, Lamothe, and Murphy 2002, Banks and Head 2004, and also argues that role-emerging placements are a good way to address the shortage of traditional placements (Healy 2005, Sadlo andCraik 2005), there appears to be a developing interest in this topic and, as such, there are an increasing number of research based papers, particularly arising from placement tutors (Soloman and Jung 2006, Thew, Hargreaves, and Cronin-Davis 2008, Clarke et al 2014a, and Clarke et al 2015.…”