Informing Design for Reflection

Mols, Ine; Hoven, Elise van den; Eggen, Berry

doi:10.1145/2971485.2971494

Cited by 28 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to the findings of Mols et al on everyday reflection [39], some participants explained that "I keep just thinking about things, just randomly they keep popping into my head.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

“…While a sizable body of work has emerged around the importance of reflection in the design process [3,42], there has been increasing focus within HCI on the reflective experiences of 'everyday' technology users [3,39,40]. Yet many questions remain on how best to facilitate reflective experiences through interaction design [3,19,44], which partly stems from the lack of a common understanding of what reflection in HCI entails [4,19].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

"A Game that Makes You Question..."

Mekler

Iacovides

Bopp

2018

Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reflection is a core design outcome for HCI, and recent work has suggested that games are well suited for prompting and supporting reflection on a variety of matters. However, research about what sorts of reflection, if any, players experience, or what benefits they might derive from it, is scarce. We report on an interview study that explored when instances of reflection occurred, at what level players reflected on their gaming experience, as well as their reactions. Our findings revealed that many players considered reflection to be a worthwhile activity in itself, highlighting its significance for the player experience beyond moment-to-moment gameplay. However, while players engaged in reflective description and dialogic reflection, we observed little to no instances of higher-level transformative and critical reflection. We conclude with a discussion of the value and challenges inherent to evaluating reflection on games. CCS Concepts •Human-centered computing → HCI design and evaluation methods; HCI theory, concepts and models; Empirical studies in HCI;

show abstract

“…Similar to the findings of Mols et al on everyday reflection [39], some participants explained that "I keep just thinking about things, just randomly they keep popping into my head.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

"A Game that Makes You Question..."

Mekler

Iacovides

Bopp

2018

Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A systematic review of 700+ papers [65] recommended the Reflection Questionnaire [44] and Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) [32] as most rigorous. The SRIS has informed HCI design considerations for supporting everyday reflection [60], but is not technology focused, instead quantifying people's tendency to self-reflect through three factors: insight (people's ability to understand themselves), engagement in self-reflection (frequency at which people self-reflect) and need for reflection (people's motivation to reflect). It was tested with a confirmatory factor analysis, test-retest study, and a comparison between Psychology students who did and did not keep a diary.…”

Section: Measuring Reflectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire

Ford

Bryan-Kinns

2023

Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reflection is underexplored in Creativity Support Tool (CST) research, partly due to its ambiguous nature. We suggest that researchers could benefit from a measure of a CST's capacity to support reflection. To this end, we detail the first stages of development of the Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire (RiCE) -a lightweight questionnaire for differentiating between creative user experiences which exhibit more or less moments of reflection. We develop RiCE through i) an expert review of questionnaire items (n=10) and ii) an exploratory factor analysis (n=300) of the reviewed items. We also present a user study testing RiCE (n=58) across two time points (one week apart) with novel interfaces designed for creative writing and music making. Although we do not confirm validity, we identify four factors for RiCE which we suggest are interpretable in a conceptually meaningful way. Our formative studies contribute towards supporting future explorations on reflection with CSTs.CCS Concepts: • Applied computing → Arts and humanities; • General and reference → Measurement; • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI ; HCI design and evaluation methods; User studies.

show abstract

“…Our findings also emphasize the importance of selective retrieval of positive memories, an aspect less recognized in HCI memory work. Previous findings have shown that retrieving positive memories can be problematic for depressed clients [13,15] who at the time of retrieval are experiencing negative moods, as it can trigger rumination [41], and comparison with one's past thus worsening the present negative mood [33].…”

Section: Positive Memory Banks For Active Encoding and Selective Retrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring and Designing for Memory Impairments in Depression

Sas

Doherty

2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Depression is an affective disorder with distinctive autobiographical memory impairments, including negative bias, overgeneralization and reduced positivity. Several clinical therapies address these impairments, and there is an opportunity to develop new supports for treatment by considering depression-associated memory impairments within design. We report on interviews with ten experts in treating depression, with expertise in both neuropsychology and cognitive behavioral therapies. The interviews explore approaches for addressing each of these memory impairments. We found consistent use of positive memories for treating all memory impairments, the challenge of direct retrieval, and the need to support the experience of positive memories. Our contributions aim to sensitize HCI researchers to the limitations of memory technologies, broaden their awareness of memory impairments beyond episodic memory recall, and inspire them to engage with this less explored design space. Our findings open up new design opportunities for memory technologies for depression, including positive memory banks for active encoding and selective retrieval, novel cues for supporting generative retrieval, and novel interfaces to strengthen the reliving of positive memories. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing • Human-centered interaction (HCI) • Empirical studies in HCI

show abstract

Informing Design for Reflection

Cited by 28 publications

References 33 publications

"A Game that Makes You Question..."

"A Game that Makes You Question..."

Towards a Reflection in Creative Experience Questionnaire

Exploring and Designing for Memory Impairments in Depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About