2008
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed Consent Revisited: A Doctrine in the Service of Cancer Care

Abstract: Informed consent traditionally has been viewed as a safeguard for the protection of patients' decisional autonomy. While informed consent is a critical means for the protection of the patient's dominion over the integrity of his body, exclusive consideration of the doctrine as a safeguard for patients eclipses the doctrine's significant benefits for the therapeutic endeavor. Undertaking a thorough informed consent process helps the physician avoid the unilateral burdens of paternalism; furthers compliance with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age of the patient might be the missing link between the context of patient compliance, consequences, and the quality of the doctor's informed consent discussion with the patient and the clinical outcome and quality of care. There is certainly a need for a specific focus on elderly female patients with early breast cancer in order to determine their interaction with caregivers and compliance with recommended treatment models .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age of the patient might be the missing link between the context of patient compliance, consequences, and the quality of the doctor's informed consent discussion with the patient and the clinical outcome and quality of care. There is certainly a need for a specific focus on elderly female patients with early breast cancer in order to determine their interaction with caregivers and compliance with recommended treatment models .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the factors, described by Thornson et al [32] as empathy, spatial orientation, cognitive involvement (both passive and active), ability to construct mental models, and introversion, were identified using questionnaires with college graduates, they demonstrate some resonance with the observations made of the participants in this study. However achieved, the subjective experience of being there prompted participants in this study to remember previous experiences of medical treatments and visits to a hospital, which has the potential to provide the foundation for new learning, to open up an opportunity for clinical dialogue in order to elicit additional clinical information, and to assess psychosocial concerns [36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 The doctrine is conspicuously aligned with values in patient autonomy; it also alleviates some of the physician's burden of decisionmaking by enlisting the patient's determination, and it induces the patient's complicity in the agreed treatment plan. 21 The global biomedical ethical approach would not endeavor to impose the doctrine when it would contravene normative values; the goal is not homogeny with Western values. Accordingly, the global approach might well seek consent from a tribal chief, at least absent effectively solicited evidence of coercion, an inability to appreciate the risks and benefits, the individual's dissent, or a decision for the community that is not in the best interests of the individual.…”
Section: Pedagogical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%