Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices

Abstract

Aims:The objectives of this article are to discuss ethical issues of informed consent in cognitively impaired patients and review considerations for capacity determination. We will also discuss how to evaluate capacity, determine competence, and obtain informed consent when a patient is deemed incompetent. This review emphasizes how to carry out informed consent procedures when capacity is questionable and discusses measures supported for use when determining cognitively impaired patients' ability to consent.Methods: Information was gathered from medical and psychological codes of ethics, peer-reviewed journals, published guidelines from health-care organizations (e.g., American Medical Association), and scholarly books. Google Scholar and PsycINFO were searched for articles related to 'informed consent' and 'cognitive impairment' published in English between 1975 and 2014. Relevant sources referenced in retrieved publications were subsequently searched and reviewed. Results:We selected 49 sources generated by our search. Sources were included in our review if they presented information related to at least one of our focus areas. These areas included: review of informed consent ethics and procedures, review of cognitive impairment evaluations, recommendations for measuring cognitive capacity, and alternative forms of informed consent.Conclusions: Patients' cognitive impairments can hinder the ability of patients to understand treatment options. Evaluating the capacity of patients with cognitive impairment to understand treatment options is vital for valid informed consent and should be guided by best practices. Thus, proper identification of patients with questionable capacity, capacity evaluation, and determination of competence, as well as reliance upon appropriate alternative consent procedures, are paramount.

Practice of informed consent in Guangdong, China: a qualitative study from the perspective of in-hospital patients

“…Under this paradigm, doctors’ obligations are to provide proper and sufficient medical information about a patient’s condition and available treatment options. 14 15 In addition to information disclosure, informed consent must also consider patients’ voluntary choices and decision-making capacity. Capacity is the ability to understand the information provided by clinicians, ask questions and express concerns before giving consent to certain treatments.…”

Autonomy and the Patient with Right Hemisphere Cognitive-Communication Deficits: Ethical Considerations in Rehabilitation Practice

“…The medical and bioethics literature has focused discussion of decisional capacity on a patient's ability to process information, make judgments, express a choice, and appreciate the consequences of his or her decision. 17,27 Therefore, the SLP communicates that although he is able to express a choice, Mr. M's executive function deficits limit his ability to meet the other requirements of decisional capacity (i.e., to process and appreciate the implications of his choice and make an appropriate judgment).…”

Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine

“…27 The operator performing the procedure should obtain informed consent from the patient or surrogate decisionmaker in special circumstances of incapacity. 28 The indications, benefits, and risks of the procedure should be discussed fully with the patient. In addition, if alternative options to the proposed procedure are available, they should be presented.…”