1996
DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed consent in clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a vast body of literature on the quality of informed consent procedures, especially in relation to clinical trials of therapeutic agents. Patient recall and comprehension of informed consent has been shown to be relatively low for both therapeutic and non-therapeutic studies [2, 3] and a number of methods have been proposed, but not uniformly adopted, to improve patient comprehension and recall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a vast body of literature on the quality of informed consent procedures, especially in relation to clinical trials of therapeutic agents. Patient recall and comprehension of informed consent has been shown to be relatively low for both therapeutic and non-therapeutic studies [2, 3] and a number of methods have been proposed, but not uniformly adopted, to improve patient comprehension and recall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive literature consistently reports a variety of problems related to the understanding component of decision making (Taub and Baker 1984;Taub 1986;Verheggen and van Wijmen 1996;Edwards et al 1998;Silva and Sorrell 1988;Sugarman et al 1998;Gotay 1991). These deficits are, however, not restricted to patients with psychiatric diagnoses or cognitive impairments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deficiencies in patients' understanding include lack of awareness of being a subject in a research study; poor recall of supplied information; lack of understanding of randomization procedures and placebo treatments; inadequate recall of important risks of procedures or treatments; lack of awareness of the ability to withdraw from a research study at any time; the "therapeutic misconception" (i.e., the belief that treatment decisions are being made solely with the individual subject's benefit in mind); and confusion about the dual roles of physician/researchers (Levine 1992;Silva and Sorrell 1988;Verheggen and van Wijmen 1996;Edwards et al 1998;Sugarman et al 1998;Robinson and Merav 1976;Muss et al 1979;Cassileth et al 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is a cumbersome task from the viewpoint of the investigator (1). Both obtaining and giving IC are very complex processes, and especially so in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%