Informed consent for paradata use in web surveys

Kunz, Tanja; Landesvatter, Camille; Gummer, Tobias

doi:10.1177/1470785320931669

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies illustrate how consumer co-researchers can contribute to quantitative studies, by reducing the complexity of informed consent and information sheets to ensure the communicating material is understood and participants are clear about how their personal information will be used (Kunz et al, 2020; Machin et al, 2022). They may also guide survey question wording and development, recruit participants, and assist with data interpretation and sensemaking.…”

Section: Cpr Checklist For Market Research–integrative Literature Rev...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Carlini

Robertson

2022

International Journal of Market Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need for better evidence on how to effectively support consumer partnerships in research (CPR). This paper aims to provide a practical checklist for market researchers to plan, implement, and report research where vulnerable consumers are the target population. A vulnerable consumer is someone who, due to their circumstances, may be disadvantaged or at risk in some marketplace situations. Here, it is proposed that research conducted about vulnerable consumers must include consumer co-researchers as partners in the research process. The involvement of consumers as co-researchers addresses this methodological gap to some extent by democratizing research design and empowering vulnerable consumers. The CPR Checklist is based on an integrative realistic review method, content validation via an expert panel, and includes consumer co-researcher involvement in the research process. Considering the complexities of vulnerable consumers and market research, the CPR Checklist provides a suite of 'how and why' questions to guide rigorous and ethical project conduct.

show abstract

Section: Cpr Checklist For Market Research–integrative Literature Rev...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Carlini

Robertson

2022

International Journal of Market Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Researchers should prepare a consent request in understandable language that clearly asks respondents for their digital permission upfront (e.g., using animated videos when soliciting informed consent; McInroy, 2017). In this light, researchers should brief respondents upfront about a) the content of the research, b) the identity and contact options of the researchers, c) the extent of confidentiality and anonymity of the responses, d) the average length of time to complete the study, and e) the risks involved in participating, such as being asked to disclose uncomfortable or potentially embarrassing information (Kunz et al, 2020; Sue & Ritter, 2012). Given that people are increasingly accustomed to using computer software, online accounts (e.g., Facebook, Gmail), and some forms of online payment without signatures, it has become customary for consent to be given via a button that indicates “I consent” after reading the introductory information (Rowbotham et al, 2013).…”

Section: Being More Ambitious About Data Quality In Online Op/ob Surv...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality

Quaquebeke

Salem²,

Dijke

et al. 2022

Organizational Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conducting organizational research via online surveys and experiments offers a host of advantages over traditional forms of data collection when it comes to sampling for more advanced study designs, while also ensuring data quality. To draw attention to these advantages and encourage researchers to fully leverage them, the present paper is structured into two parts. First, along a structure of commonly used research designs, we showcase select organizational psychology (OP) and organizational behavior (OB) research and explain how the Internet makes it feasible to conduct research not only with larger and more representative samples, but also with more complex research designs than circumstances usually allow in offline settings. Subsequently, because online data collections often also come with some data quality concerns, in the second section, we synthesize the methodological literature to outline three improvement areas and several accompanying strategies for bolstering data quality. Plain Language Summary: These days, many theories from the fields of organizational psychology and organizational behavior are tested online simply because it is easier. The point of this paper is to illustrate the unique advantages of the Internet beyond mere convenience—specifically, how the related technologies offer more than simply the ability to mirror offline studies. Accordingly, our paper first guides readers through examples of more ambitious online survey and experimental research designs within the organizational domain. Second, we address the potential data quality drawbacks of these approaches by outlining three concrete areas of improvement. Each comes with specific recommendations that can ensure higher data quality when conducting organizational survey or experimental research online.

show abstract

“…Logically, the reminder strategy requires identifying each sample unit, as the notification should only be received by those who have not participated. Analysis of the paradata (Kunz et al, 2020) plays a crucial role in the use of this strategy. It indicates which questionnaires have reached their destination, which have been opened, etc., and provides information on the optimal time to send reminders.…”

Section: Increased Number Of Contactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estrategias para mejorar la respuesta de las encuestas en línea

Igúzquiza

2022

PapRevSoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Una visión histórica de las herramientas de recogida de información desvela un progresivo descenso de las encuestas cara a cara y telefónicas, que han sido sustituidas por las autoadministradas. Los avances tecnológicos han supuesto un gran incremento de las encuestas a través de la red en la segunda década del siglo XXI. Ahora bien, muchas de estas investigaciones presentan tasas de respuesta muy bajas, algunas de menos de dos dígitos. Para solventar esta situación, este trabajo presenta cinco estrategias efectivas para mejorar la respuesta de las encuestas a través de la red. Concretamente, poner máximo cuidado en el acceso a la persona encuestada, contactar varias veces con la muestra objetivo, ajustar la duración del trabajo de campo, notificar a la persona que se va a encuestar que ha sido seleccionada para participar en una investigación, y utilizar gratificaciones. La aplicación de estas estrategias consigue un notable aumento de la tasa de respuesta y, además, una mejor representatividad muestral.

show abstract

Informed consent for paradata use in web surveys

Cited by 8 publications

References 19 publications

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality

Estrategias para mejorar la respuesta de las encuestas en línea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About