2012
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed consent for clinical treatment: Figure 1:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
235
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
235
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was supplemented by analysis of published articles. For example, a systematic review found that physicians rarely discuss alternatives, risks, and benefits when obtaining consent, and tend to overestimate patient's comprehension of the information [15]. As a result, those items were discussed for inclusion in the checklist.…”
Section: Checklist Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was supplemented by analysis of published articles. For example, a systematic review found that physicians rarely discuss alternatives, risks, and benefits when obtaining consent, and tend to overestimate patient's comprehension of the information [15]. As a result, those items were discussed for inclusion in the checklist.…”
Section: Checklist Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In a systematic review, researchers have documented that many physicians do not meet the minimum standards when they conduct informed consent with patients. 2 Physicians tend to discuss the procedure but rarely discuss alternatives, risks, and benefits of the procedure. Even when they deliver complete informed consent, they tend to overestimate patient's comprehension of the information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The informed consent was fastened in Russia in 2011 year by the State Law -About health care‖. According to Daniel E.Hall's study, -informed consent has become the primary paradigm for protecting the legal rights of patients and guiding the ethical practice of medicine‖ [10]. It has three purposes: legal, ethical and administrative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%