Abstract:We examine a general equilibrium model with asymmetrically informed agents. The presence of asymmetric information generally presents a conflict between incentive compatibility and Pareto efficiency. We present a notion of informational size and show that the conflict between incentive compatibility and efficiency can be made arbitrarily small if agents are of sufficiently small informational size.
“…It is well-known, however, that truthful revelation is generally no longer incentive compatible when we move from a private values environment to an interdependent values environment. In McLean and Postlewaite (2014) (henceforth MP (2014)) we showed that, when agents are informationally small in the sense of McLean and Postlewaite (2002), there exists a modi…cation of a generalized VCG mechanism using small additional transfers that restores incentive compatibility. This paper presents an alternative, two-stage non-direct mechanism that accomplishes the same goal -restoring incentive compatibility for interdependent value problems.…”
Much of the literature on mechanism design and implementation uses the revelation principle to restrict attention to direct mechanisms. This is without loss of generality in a well de…ned sense. It is, however, restrictive if one is concerned with the set of equilibria, if one is concerned about the size of messages that will be sent, or if one is concerned about privacy. We showed in McLean and Postlewaite (2014) that when agents are informationally small, there exist small modi…cations to VCG mechanisms in interdependent value problems that restore incentive compatibility. We show here how one can construct a two-stage mechanism that similarly restores incentive compatibility while improving upon the direct one stage mechanism in terms of privacy and the size of messages that must be sent. The …rst stage essentially elicits that part of the agents' private information that induces interdependence and reveals it to all agents, transforming the interdependent value problem into a private value problem. The second stage is a VCG mechanism for the now private value problem. Agents typically need to transmit substantially less information in the two stage mechanism than would be necessary for a single stage mechanism. Lastly, the …rst stage that elicits the part of the agents'private information that induces interdependence can be used to transform certain other interdependent value problems into private value problems.
“…It is well-known, however, that truthful revelation is generally no longer incentive compatible when we move from a private values environment to an interdependent values environment. In McLean and Postlewaite (2014) (henceforth MP (2014)) we showed that, when agents are informationally small in the sense of McLean and Postlewaite (2002), there exists a modi…cation of a generalized VCG mechanism using small additional transfers that restores incentive compatibility. This paper presents an alternative, two-stage non-direct mechanism that accomplishes the same goal -restoring incentive compatibility for interdependent value problems.…”
Much of the literature on mechanism design and implementation uses the revelation principle to restrict attention to direct mechanisms. This is without loss of generality in a well de…ned sense. It is, however, restrictive if one is concerned with the set of equilibria, if one is concerned about the size of messages that will be sent, or if one is concerned about privacy. We showed in McLean and Postlewaite (2014) that when agents are informationally small, there exist small modi…cations to VCG mechanisms in interdependent value problems that restore incentive compatibility. We show here how one can construct a two-stage mechanism that similarly restores incentive compatibility while improving upon the direct one stage mechanism in terms of privacy and the size of messages that must be sent. The …rst stage essentially elicits that part of the agents' private information that induces interdependence and reveals it to all agents, transforming the interdependent value problem into a private value problem. The second stage is a VCG mechanism for the now private value problem. Agents typically need to transmit substantially less information in the two stage mechanism than would be necessary for a single stage mechanism. Lastly, the …rst stage that elicits the part of the agents'private information that induces interdependence can be used to transform certain other interdependent value problems into private value problems.
“…It is well-known, however, that truthful revelation is generally no longer incentive compatible when we move from a private values environment to an interdependent values environment. In McLean and Postlewaite (2014) (henceforth MP (2014)) we showed that, when agents are informationally small in the sense of McLean and Postlewaite (2002), there exists a modi…cation of a generalized VCG mechanism using small additional transfers that restores incentive compatibility. This paper presents an alternative, two-stage, mechanism that accomplishes the same goal -restoring incentive compatibility for interdependent value problems.…”
We showed in McLean and Postlewaite (2014) that when agents are informationally small, there exist small modi…cations to VCG mechanisms in interdependent value problems that restore incentive compatibility. This paper presents a two-stage mechanism that similarly restores incentive compatibility. The …rst stage essentially elicits that part of the agents' private information that induces interdependence and reveals it to all agents, transforming the interdependent value problem into a private value problem. The second stage is a VCG mechanism for the now private value problem. Agents typically need to transmit substantially less information in the two stage mechanism than would be necessary for a single stage mechanism. Lastly, the …rst stage that elicits the part of the agents' private information that induces interdependence can be used to transform certain other interdependent value problems into private value problems.
“…It is well-known, however, that truthful revelation is generally no longer incentive compatible when we move from a private values environment to an interdependent values environment. In McLean and Postlewaite (2014) (henceforth MP (2014)) we showed that, when agents are informationally small in the sense of McLean and Postlewaite (2002), there exists a modification of a generalized VCG mechanism using small additional transfers that restores incentive compatibility. This paper presents an alternative, two-stage non-direct mechanism that accomplishes the same goal -restoring incentive compatibility for interdependent value problems.…”
Much of the literature on mechanism design and implementation uses the revelation principle to restrict attention to direct mechanisms. We showed in McLean and Postlewaite (2014) that when agents are informationally small, there exist small modifications to VCG mechanisms in interdependent value problems that restore incentive compatibility. We show here how one can construct a two-stage non-direct mechanism that similarly restores incentive compatibility while improving upon the direct one stage mechanism in terms of privacy and the size of messages that must be sent. The first stage that elicits the part of the agents' private information that induces interdependence can be used to transform certain other interdependent value problems into private value problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.