2021
DOI: 10.1109/tci.2020.3048271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informational Lithography Approach Based on Source and Mask Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second adverse case is structures composed of multiple junctions. For a structure with M 1 junctions, the complexity of RCWA is M 1 O N 3 1 , in which N 1 is the number of plane waves in RCWA. In contrast, the numerical complexity for the proposed method is M 2 O N 1.5 2 , in which M 2 is the required iteration number for solving the block matrix problem in equation (34) and N 2 is the unknown number with finite difference modelling.…”
Section: E Numerical Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second adverse case is structures composed of multiple junctions. For a structure with M 1 junctions, the complexity of RCWA is M 1 O N 3 1 , in which N 1 is the number of plane waves in RCWA. In contrast, the numerical complexity for the proposed method is M 2 O N 1.5 2 , in which M 2 is the required iteration number for solving the block matrix problem in equation (34) and N 2 is the unknown number with finite difference modelling.…”
Section: E Numerical Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the numerical complexity for the proposed method is M 2 O N 1.5 2 , in which M 2 is the required iteration number for solving the block matrix problem in equation (34) and N 2 is the unknown number with finite difference modelling. This means RCWA method needs to conduct O N 3 1 computation for M 1 times. Even though M 2 is apparently larger than M 1 , the overall complexity is maintained at O(N 1.5 ) level.…”
Section: E Numerical Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%