2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Visualization, Web 2.0, and the Teaching of Writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concern for informal environments is also represented by work focused on digital pedagogy attached to physical classrooms, such as traditional course management systems (e.g., Angel, Blackboard, Desire2Learn), blogs, and wikis (Barton, 2005;Car, Morrison, Cox, & Deacon, 2007;Carter & Arroyo, 2011;Strenski, Feagin, & Singer, 2005). While scholars in computers and writing share some concerns with researchers interested in informal learning, much of the work in our field shares a focus on these spaces as an extension of physical classroom environments (Vie, 2008;Sorapure, 2010;Maranto & Barton, 2010;Clark, 2010). There are no studies that we are aware of that focus on these spaces as learning environments with their own characteristics, uses, and affordances distinct from formal educational contexts.…”
Section: Informal Learning Environments In Computers and Writing Resementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The concern for informal environments is also represented by work focused on digital pedagogy attached to physical classrooms, such as traditional course management systems (e.g., Angel, Blackboard, Desire2Learn), blogs, and wikis (Barton, 2005;Car, Morrison, Cox, & Deacon, 2007;Carter & Arroyo, 2011;Strenski, Feagin, & Singer, 2005). While scholars in computers and writing share some concerns with researchers interested in informal learning, much of the work in our field shares a focus on these spaces as an extension of physical classroom environments (Vie, 2008;Sorapure, 2010;Maranto & Barton, 2010;Clark, 2010). There are no studies that we are aware of that focus on these spaces as learning environments with their own characteristics, uses, and affordances distinct from formal educational contexts.…”
Section: Informal Learning Environments In Computers and Writing Resementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Technology promises to make learning more relevant and engaging by bringing more of the outside world into the classroom (Moore, 2013;Raddaoui, 2012). It can impact the teaching and learning process by personalizing learning (Bruce & Casey, 2012), allowing for more constructivist or inquiry-based practices (Hagerman & White, 2013;Harper & Milman, 2016;Raddaoui, 2012;Solomon & Schrum, 2007), and making traditional subjects such as writing more collaborative and participatory (Pow & Fu, 2012, Sorapure, 2010. While hopes for technology integration have been realized in some contexts outside of school (Calderón, 2009;James & Hull, 2007;Scott & White, 2013), widespread innovative implementation as anticipated has proven more challenging (Dolan, 2016 Internet emerged as a rapidly expanding tool capable of driving unprecedented changes across business and education sectors.…”
Section: The Call For Technology In Education In the Us: Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolfe (2015) describes two specific classroom activities focused on critically developing data categorization schemes and articulating storylines in data visualizations. In the related field of digital composition, Sorapure (2010) outlines several types of information visualization projects that introduce students to interactive visual composition with textual, personal, or social data. Technical communicators also point out that critical reflection on the use of computing tools should not be confined to the humanities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%