Abstract:The information transmitted through a parallel summing array of noisy threshold elements with a common threshold is considered. In particular, using theoretical and numerical analysis, a recently reported [N. G. Stocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2310 (2000)] form of stochastic resonance, termed suprathreshold stochastic resonance (SSR), is studied in detail. SSR is observed to occur in arrays with two or more elements and, unlike stochastic resonance (SR) in a single element, gives rise to noise-induced information… Show more
“…into parallel arrays, instead of using a single one in isolation. For nonlinearities associated in parallel arrays, an interesting form of stochastic resonance consists in purposely injecting additional noises, on each device of the array, to induce more variability and richness in the responses of the devices [17]. A global response collected over the array of noisy devices can sometimes bring improvement over the performance of a single device with no extra added noise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A global response collected over the array of noisy devices can sometimes bring improvement over the performance of a single device with no extra added noise. Various forms of enhanced processing through stochastic resonance in arrays have recently been demonstrated, essentially with two-state quantizers [17], [13], [15] corresponding to the nonlinearity of Figure 1c tuned at λ = 0. Saturating nonlinearities like those of Figures 1a and 1b, in terms of SNR gain with Gaussian noise, have been shown here to be superior to threshold nonlinearities like those of Figures 1c and 1d.…”
Abstract. A harmonic signal corrupted by an additive white noise is processed by an arbitrary memoryless nonlinear device. The transformation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by the nonlinearity is explicitly computed and analyzed for Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise. Simple nonlinearities, easily implementable as electronic circuits, are shown capable of producing an amplification of the SNR. Such an amplification is not obtainable with linear filters, whatever their complexity or high order, but becomes easily accessible with simple nonlinear devices.
“…into parallel arrays, instead of using a single one in isolation. For nonlinearities associated in parallel arrays, an interesting form of stochastic resonance consists in purposely injecting additional noises, on each device of the array, to induce more variability and richness in the responses of the devices [17]. A global response collected over the array of noisy devices can sometimes bring improvement over the performance of a single device with no extra added noise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A global response collected over the array of noisy devices can sometimes bring improvement over the performance of a single device with no extra added noise. Various forms of enhanced processing through stochastic resonance in arrays have recently been demonstrated, essentially with two-state quantizers [17], [13], [15] corresponding to the nonlinearity of Figure 1c tuned at λ = 0. Saturating nonlinearities like those of Figures 1a and 1b, in terms of SNR gain with Gaussian noise, have been shown here to be superior to threshold nonlinearities like those of Figures 1c and 1d.…”
Abstract. A harmonic signal corrupted by an additive white noise is processed by an arbitrary memoryless nonlinear device. The transformation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by the nonlinearity is explicitly computed and analyzed for Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise. Simple nonlinearities, easily implementable as electronic circuits, are shown capable of producing an amplification of the SNR. Such an amplification is not obtainable with linear filters, whatever their complexity or high order, but becomes easily accessible with simple nonlinear devices.
“…This non-standard strategy to design suboptimal detectors based on two-state quantizers benefits from recent studies on the use of stochastic resonance and the constructive role of noise in nonlinear processes [9][10][11][12][13][14]. This paradoxical nonlinear phenomenon, has been intensively studied during the last two decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances, the mechanism of improvement, qualitatively, is that the noise assists small signals in overcoming the threshold of the two-state quantizer. Recently, another form of stochastic resonance was proposed in [9,10], with parallel arrays of two-state quantizers, under the name of suprathreshold stochastic resonance. This form in [9][10][11][12][13][14] applies to signals of arbitrary amplitude, which do not need to be small and subthreshold, whence the name.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, another form of stochastic resonance was proposed in [9,10], with parallel arrays of two-state quantizers, under the name of suprathreshold stochastic resonance. This form in [9][10][11][12][13][14] applies to signals of arbitrary amplitude, which do not need to be small and subthreshold, whence the name. Different measures of performance have been studied to quantify the suprathreshold stochastic resonance: general information measures like the input-output Shannon mutual information [9], the input-output correlation coefficient [11], signal-to-noise ratios [11,13], in an estimation context with the Fisher information contained in the array output [12] or in a detection context with a probability of error [14].…”
We compare the performance of two detection schemes in charge of detecting the presence of a signal buried in an additive noise. One of these is the correlation receiver (linear detector), which is optimal when the noise is Gaussian. The other detector is obtained by applying the same correlation receiver to the output of a nonlinear preprocessor formed by a summing parallel array of two-state quantizers. We show that the performance of the collective detection realized by the array can benefit from an injection of independent noises purposely added on each individual quantizer. We show that this nonlinear detector can achieve better performance compared to the linear detector for various situations of non-Gaussian noise. This occurs for both Bayesian and Neyman-Pearson detection strategies with periodic and aperiodic signals. r
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.