2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Transfer and Criticality in the Ising Model on the Human Connectome

Abstract: We implement the Ising model on a structural connectivity matrix describing the brain at two different resolutions. Tuning the model temperature to its critical value, i.e. at the susceptibility peak, we find a maximal amount of total information transfer between the spin variables. At this point the amount of information that can be redistributed by some nodes reaches a limit and the net dynamics exhibits signature of the law of diminishing marginal returns, a fundamental principle connected to saturated leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
89
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results on a measure related to T pw have been obtained by directly simulating the Ising model with the Metropolis dynamics and Glauber dynamics [18].…”
Section: A Shannon Entropy Based Information Flow For the Metropolissupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results on a measure related to T pw have been obtained by directly simulating the Ising model with the Metropolis dynamics and Glauber dynamics [18].…”
Section: A Shannon Entropy Based Information Flow For the Metropolissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Instead, the Wolff MC method is used to calculate the information flows, according to Eqs. (17), (18), (23), and (24), in the kinetic Ising model with the Metropolis and the Glauber dynamics, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The structural connectomics essentially comprises a comprehensive map of the anatomical connections reflecting axonal pathways (Sporns et al, 2005), and the structural covariance connectivity interpreted as the phenotype of brain development and/or plasticity (Alexander-Bloch et al, 2013;He et al, 2007). Additionally, the functional connectomics can be captured as patterns of functional covariance network Zhang et al, 2011), functional connectivity (FC) and effective connectivity (EC) networks (Friston, 2009(Friston, , 2011Marinazzo et al, 2011Marinazzo et al, , 2014Wu et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%