1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1978.00174.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Theory and Sequences of Land Use: An Application

Abstract: This paper addresses the question of how far into the past previous land‐use patterns provide significant information concerning present or future patterns. The provision of information is viewed as a reduction in uncertainty. An information‐theoretic approach that permits both statistical and graphical analysis is suggested. Application of this method to the analysis of land‐use change in three townships on the fringe of Akron, Ohio suggests that, to a varying degree, the processes of change are first‐order M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a few hundred hectares of land are involved, data sampling is usually applied to limit the workload to scattered plots or transects (Baker, 1989). On the other hand, land use studies using Markov chain models tend to focus on a much larger spatial scale, and involve both urban and non-urban covers (Drewett, 1969;Bourne, 1971;Bell, 1974;Bell and Hinojosa, 1977;Robinson, 1978;Jahan, 1986;Muller and Middleton, 1994). All of these studies use the first-order Markov chain models.…”
Section: Markov Modelling Of Land Use and Land Cover Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a few hundred hectares of land are involved, data sampling is usually applied to limit the workload to scattered plots or transects (Baker, 1989). On the other hand, land use studies using Markov chain models tend to focus on a much larger spatial scale, and involve both urban and non-urban covers (Drewett, 1969;Bourne, 1971;Bell, 1974;Bell and Hinojosa, 1977;Robinson, 1978;Jahan, 1986;Muller and Middleton, 1994). All of these studies use the first-order Markov chain models.…”
Section: Markov Modelling Of Land Use and Land Cover Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these studies use the first-order Markov chain models. The order of the Markov chains has only been formally tested in a few studies (Bell, 1974;Robinson, 1978). Stationarity has usually been assumed, except in a few instances where it has been tested (Bourne, 1971;Bell, 1974;Bell and Hinojosa, 1977).…”
Section: Markov Modelling Of Land Use and Land Cover Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markov chains have been widely used to model land use changes including both urban and nonurban areas at large spatial scales (Drewett, 1969;Bourne, 1971;Bell, 1974;Robinson, 1978;Jahan, 1986;Muller and Middleton, 1994). Stationary and first-order have usually been assumed except in a few studies where the stationary or the order of Markov chains was tested (Bell, 1974;Robinson, 1978).…”
Section: Markov Analysis Of the Land Use Change Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stationary and first-order have usually been assumed except in a few studies where the stationary or the order of Markov chains was tested (Bell, 1974;Robinson, 1978). This paper assumed land use change as a finite first-order Markov chain with stationary transition probabilities, and different categories were the states of a chain, and both time homogeneity (time stationary) and Markov property (time independence) were tested using Pearson χ 2 goodness-of-fit tests.…”
Section: Markov Analysis Of the Land Use Change Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only large gain in information occurs when considering sequences of length 2. Along the lines set forth in Robinson (1978), the information graphs exhibits a well-defined elbow indicating the appropriateness of a first-order model. The graph suggests that information gains are not large when considering sequences of lengths 3, 4, and 5, and that little information is gained by speclfying a model of an order greater than one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%