2021 20th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/infoteh51037.2021.9400653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Systems Success Models in the E-Government : Context: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the structures that support the IS success model have a big influence on how satisfied customers are with E-government services [20]. In relation to the three quality parameters, intention to use, and user satisfaction, organizational performance and environmental sustainability are studied as the two key characteristics of E-government public value [21]. However, the research question is how to develop a model to examine user satisfaction with E-government services in Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the structures that support the IS success model have a big influence on how satisfied customers are with E-government services [20]. In relation to the three quality parameters, intention to use, and user satisfaction, organizational performance and environmental sustainability are studied as the two key characteristics of E-government public value [21]. However, the research question is how to develop a model to examine user satisfaction with E-government services in Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In measuring the success of government systems or services, Martono et al (2020) [13], Puspitarini & Ardhani (2022) [14], Stefanovic et al (2016) [15], and Gangga Dewi & Fajar (2021) [16] successfully exercised DeLone and McLean Information System Success Model (ISSM) [17] to measure the IS success. Accordingly, Stefanovic et al (2021) [18] reaffirm that ISSM is the most widely used measurement to measure IS success within the e-government context. Stefanovic et al (2016) [15] also evaluate the IS success of an e-government system from the view of employees in the Republic of Serbia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In assessing the acceptance, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), developed by Venkatesh et al (2003) [27] and perfected by Venkatesh et al (2012) [28], becomes one of the baseline models to explain user intention to use an IS in an organisation setting such as in e-government research [12], [26], [29]- [38]. Their findings prove that the four construct (Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, and Social Influence) affect the intention to use, which subsequently influences the system use .Further, Stefanovic et al (2021) [18] explain that many scholars combine UTAUT in the ISSM construct to complement their studies [12], [14], [29], [38], [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Maturity models are often applied at the organizational level to evaluate and enhance the maturity of e-governance processes, service delivery, and overall capabilities (Kawashita et al 2020;Hujran et al 2023). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis 1989) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Stefanovic et al 2021) are user-centric models that focus on understanding and predicting user acceptance and adoption of technology, including e-government services. TAM emphasizes Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness, while UTAUT incorporates additional factors such as Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions (Pedrosa et al 2020;Zeebaree et al 2022).…”
Section: Assessing Electronic Public Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%