2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information sharing challenges in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of patient, family and professional perspectives on the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System

Abstract: ObjectivesTo explore current challenges in interdisciplinary management of end-of-life care in the community and the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System (EPaCCS) to facilitate the delivery of care that meets patient preferences.DesignQualitative study using interviews and focus groups.SettingHealth and Social Care Services in the North of England.Participants71 participants, 62 health and social care professionals, 9 patients and family members.ResultsFour key themes were identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Care coordination issues have previously been described in home-based and other palliative care models; 35 efforts are underway to improve electronic and other information sharing. 36 In this intervention, the impact of the specialty-based palliative care team was more salient to patients and care partners than changes in their primary neurologist. Eight hours of training may be insufficient to significantly change practice but sufficient to convince neurologists of the potential benefits of referring to and collaborating closely with specialty palliative care teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care coordination issues have previously been described in home-based and other palliative care models; 35 efforts are underway to improve electronic and other information sharing. 36 In this intervention, the impact of the specialty-based palliative care team was more salient to patients and care partners than changes in their primary neurologist. Eight hours of training may be insufficient to significantly change practice but sufficient to convince neurologists of the potential benefits of referring to and collaborating closely with specialty palliative care teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the resources for advance care planning being highly variable, electronic palliative care coordination systems (EPaCCS) designed to share patient preferences between health and social care providers are increasingly being adopted in the UK healthcare system [ 33 ]. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that their benefits are limited due to the additional administrative burden they place in filling out the documentation, and the lack of interoperability with other commonly used electronic health care systems [ 33 ]. In some cases, this has led to EPaCCS systems not being accessed because of low confidence in the data quality held within the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 The frustrations experienced by service users when asked to repeat similar information, and professionals' concerns about lack of information can be mitigated by having an electronic care summary available to all unscheduled care services. 34 Reviews of electronic care coordination systems show that these were strongly associated with more care being delivered at home. 4 Electronic care coordination systems need to record, review and share a care plan that aligns with what matters most to our sickest patients.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%