2020
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1804139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Seeking Behaviors and Intentions in Response to Environmental Health Risk Messages: A Test of A Reduced Risk Information Seeking Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome of stage 3 is driven by the interaction between perceived threat and efficacy, affective state, and individual difference and, as framed by the EPPM, results in no response (driver C: insufficient threat perceived), defensive response (driver D: defensive motivation), or problem-focused response (driver E: protection motivation). Decision-making in stage 3 may be extended by driver F (information seeking), which is a precursor to developing intentions around action [ 65 ]. Neither the EPPM nor the PAPM provide well-established drivers at stages 6 and 7, for which habit formation and actual, as opposed to perceived, efficacy are expected to be important [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of stage 3 is driven by the interaction between perceived threat and efficacy, affective state, and individual difference and, as framed by the EPPM, results in no response (driver C: insufficient threat perceived), defensive response (driver D: defensive motivation), or problem-focused response (driver E: protection motivation). Decision-making in stage 3 may be extended by driver F (information seeking), which is a precursor to developing intentions around action [ 65 ]. Neither the EPPM nor the PAPM provide well-established drivers at stages 6 and 7, for which habit formation and actual, as opposed to perceived, efficacy are expected to be important [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were collected as part of a larger online experiment in which participants were randomly assigned to a message condition (lower threat, higher threat, or no message control), with or without a cue to seek information (i.e., “Be proactive—get more information about [risk] today.”) and topic (arsenic, BPA, or VOCs; see Hovick, Bigsby, Wilson, & Thomas, 2020). Participants in the control conditions were excluded from these analyses because they did not receive (and therefore did not process) a message.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, they were given an opportunity to seek information online on the risk topic they were assigned (i.e., “Would you like to seek more information about [topic]?”). Participants who answered “yes” were directed to an online search page (separate from the Qualtrics survey) that mimicked a google search results page and contained live links to information produced by state and federal agencies (for more information, see Hovick et al., 2020). Once they completed seeking information, participants were asked to complete a final set of assessments, including information acquisition intentions and behavioral intentions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TMIM and RISP model converge in terms of highlighting the difference between one's current and desired levels of knowledge or uncertainty as an important motivator of information seeking. Many recent studies have employed the RISP model or TMIM to examine the effects of different antecedents on OHIS (Hovick et al, 2020;Kanter et al, 2019;J. Li & Zheng, 2020;So et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theories Of Information Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%