2012
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research: a preliminary study of factors affecting successful collaborations

Abstract: Objectives: This pilot study explores the conditions that support or hinder information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research teams. Methods: We undertook a preliminary grounded theory study investigating factors that impact on information professionals' participation in interdisciplinary research. Four biomedical information professionals working in academic universities and teaching hospitals in Canada participated in semi-structured interviews. Grounded theory methods guided the data co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If participation on research teams involves an element of work outside the normal scope of what librarians do on a day‐to‐day basis, one might ask what these information professionals hope to gain by pushing the boundaries of their job descriptions. Lorenzetti and Rutherford interviewed four biomedical information professionals working in academic universities and teaching hospitals. They identified that the pursuit of authorship opportunities may be a key driver for joining research teams, especially if these librarians have academic status and the imperative to publish is a component of career advancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If participation on research teams involves an element of work outside the normal scope of what librarians do on a day‐to‐day basis, one might ask what these information professionals hope to gain by pushing the boundaries of their job descriptions. Lorenzetti and Rutherford interviewed four biomedical information professionals working in academic universities and teaching hospitals. They identified that the pursuit of authorship opportunities may be a key driver for joining research teams, especially if these librarians have academic status and the imperative to publish is a component of career advancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they identified that information professionals may agree be motivated to join research teams out of professional insecurity, concerned that if they turn down opportunities they might not arise again. In terms of non traditional tasks and services, Lorenzetti and Rutherford (p280) also advanced the idea that those librarians who can approach work on research teams as an opportunity for ‘professional learning and growth rather than simply an occasion to demonstrate existing skills may find more opportunities to engage in research than those who cannot’. Roland and Glenn similarly found that participants in their study were unusually innovative and entrepreneurial compared with those who did not work on research teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to content forms part of the framework for health information in Scotland, alongside the information literacy to be able to access, appraise and apply evidence. 3 Writing from a cancer perspective, patient information in Northern Ireland is integrated into clinical care at the local level, as part of clinical pathways. The Welsh Assembly Government does not yet have a strategy for health information, but initial steps are being taken that will lead either to a cancer information strategy or to a wider health information strategy.…”
Section: Uk-wide Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Ford et al conclude their review by highlighting areas for further research in the area of public health, 2 a research need which library and information workers are potentially well placed to help fulfil; Lorenzetti et al's manuscript signposting the way to successful LIS participation in interdisciplinary research. 3 Elsewhere, the contributions to librarian and neuroscientists to Iran's scientific publications in neuroscience is the subject of Mohammadhassanzadeh et al's manuscript. 4 Forecasts, predictions and processes are the foci of the remaining manuscripts in this issue of HILJ.…”
Section: Uk-wide Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorenzetti and Rutherford explore a different aspect of professional competence, namely participation in research. In a pilot study conducted in Canada the authors used in‐depth interviews with four biomedical information professionals to explore the conditions that either support or hinder information professionals’ participation in interdisciplinary research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%